I hate Peters rabbit-punching!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BattlingNelson
    Mod a Phukka
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 29881
    • 3,255
    • 3,200
    • 286,536

    #1

    I hate Peters rabbit-punching!

    Why cant the ref. see that it's part of Sam Peters game-plan to use illegal tactics? There ARE rules in boxing and I hate when they are deliberately broken.

    I'm not saying Maskaev would have won if not for the rabbit punching, but I hate dirty fighters.

    I hope Vitali knocks Peter out!
  • Fox McCloud
    Mission Complete!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 18176
    • 789
    • 1,151
    • 26,037

    #2
    In fairness, rabbit punching is kind of a two player game. The back of the head has to be exposed in some way for a rabbit punch to occur. It Maskaev was getting himself turned around or ducking his head down, then it's not entirely Peter's fault, although he still does get some blame for it.

    But it very well could be that Peter himself was turning Maskaev in those positions at times, or pushing his head down before throwing a rabbit punch. I can't recall if that happened tonight.

    Mayweather put his head down quite a few times against Hatton, but the point-deduction instance was caused when Hatton turned him and bent him over, and then threw the punch. Those are the only times when a point deduction should occur... when only one fighter is at fault for making a rabbit punch happen. I didn't see much of that tonight for Sam Peter.

    Comment

    • BattlingNelson
      Mod a Phukka
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 29881
      • 3,255
      • 3,200
      • 286,536

      #3
      Originally posted by DWiens421
      In fairness, rabbit punching is kind of a two player game. The back of the head has to be exposed in some way for a rabbit punch to occur. It Maskaev was getting himself turned around or ducking his head down, then it's not entirely Peter's fault, although he still does get some blame for it.

      But it very well could be that Peter himself was turning Maskaev in those positions at times, or pushing his head down before throwing a rabbit punch. I can't recall if that happened tonight.

      Mayweather put his head down quite a few times against Hatton, but the point-deduction instance was caused when Hatton turned him and bent him over, and then threw the punch. Those are the only times when a point deduction should occur... when only one fighter is at fault for making a rabbit punch happen. I didn't see much of that tonight for Sam Peter.
      They way I saw it it was fully intentional. It often happened in the clinches when Oleg's head was on Peters shoulder, Peter fired shots that couldn't hit anywhere but in the back of his head.

      I hate rabbit-punching. It's a big cause of braindamage. Look at Ali-Wepner. The most rabbit-punching I've ever seen. Although we may never know for sure it may have added significantly to Alis health today.

      Somebody should give Peter a fundamental boxing-lesson.

      Comment

      • beez721
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2005
        • 9637
        • 252
        • 55
        • 16,400

        #4
        Originally posted by DWiens421
        In fairness, rabbit punching is kind of a two player game. The back of the head has to be exposed in some way for a rabbit punch to occur. It Maskaev was getting himself turned around or ducking his head down, then it's not entirely Peter's fault, although he still does get some blame for it.

        But it very well could be that Peter himself was turning Maskaev in those positions at times, or pushing his head down before throwing a rabbit punch. I can't recall if that happened tonight.

        Mayweather put his head down quite a few times against Hatton, but the point-deduction instance was caused when Hatton turned him and bent him over, and then threw the punch. Those are the only times when a point deduction should occur... when only one fighter is at fault for making a rabbit punch happen. I didn't see much of that tonight for Sam Peter.
        its too much of a coincidence that every peter opponent gets hit there every time

        Comment

        • KESSLER
          GOONER FOR LIFE
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2007
          • 15487
          • 782
          • 716
          • 24,000

          #5
          Originally posted by BatTheMan
          Why cant the ref. see that it's part of Sam Peters game-plan to use illegal tactics? There ARE rules in boxing and I hate when they are deliberately broken.

          I'm not saying Maskaev would have won if not for the rabbit punching, but I hate dirty fighters.

          I hope Vitali knocks Peter out!
          Haye won baby.. Pay up!

          Comment

          • Toller
            Toller
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Feb 2004
            • 870
            • 73
            • 274
            • 8,135

            #6
            I can't stand Sam Peter, what a dirty ****ish way to fight. I thought he looked terrible, very little coordination with his punches. Hopefully Wlad will smash him to bits in his next fight (and I don't like Wlad).

            Comment

            • BattlingNelson
              Mod a Phukka
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 29881
              • 3,255
              • 3,200
              • 286,536

              #7
              Originally posted by SJB'09
              I can't stand Sam Peter, what a dirty ****ish way to fight. I thought he looked terrible, very little coordination with his punches. Hopefully Wlad will smash him to bits in his next fight (and I don't like Wlad).
              Its VITALI Klitschko next. Not Wladimir.

              Comment

              • Toller
                Toller
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Feb 2004
                • 870
                • 73
                • 274
                • 8,135

                #8
                Originally posted by BatTheMan
                Its VITALI Klitschko next. Not Wladimir.
                Maybe........

                Comment

                • Mr. Philadel
                  #215Boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 20893
                  • 1,071
                  • 1,413
                  • 35,332

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BatTheMan
                  Its VITALI Klitschko next. Not Wladimir.
                  thank god! we dont need another boring 36 minute class on how to throw a jab by Dr. Klitchsko!

                  Plus Peter already sat Wlad on his ass 3 times! Vitali needs to fall once in his career! I think Vitali is the toughest of the brothers, but i still think Lewis would've knocked him out if the fight had kept going! Real Talk!!!

                  Comment

                  • BattlingNelson
                    Mod a Phukka
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 29881
                    • 3,255
                    • 3,200
                    • 286,536

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SekondzOut
                    thank god! we dont need another boring 36 minute class on how to throw a jab by Dr. Klitchsko!

                    Plus Peter already sat Wlad on his ass 3 times! Vitali needs to fall once in his career! I think Vitali is the toughest of the brothers, but i still think Lewis would've knocked him out if the fight had kept going! Real Talk!!!
                    Should he fall, which I doubt, then lets hope it's not from those cheapshot rabbit-punches.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP