That fight was in Australia, with biases judges. I had SM ahead on my scorecards by a score of 67-65 and I was rooting for KZ at the time, so I might've given him a round that was close. It could've well been 68-64 in SM's favor. Anyway, I think SM will pull it off this time but it's only my opinion. I seem to be in the minority here.
Explain me - what has made Mitchell to be ahead Tszyu in that fight? I looked this fightl repeatedly: Kostya held a situation under the control and set a manner and rate of fight. SM in that fight precisely did not win by scorecards.
Mitchell wins by UD; Tszyu has not been in a fight in a very long time on top of the training injuries he has experienced. Mitchell has fought almost 10 times since he and tszyu first fought. He is much more experienced than he was in the first fight and he is hungrier.
Mitchell wins by UD; Tszyu has not been in a fight in a very long time on top of the training injuries he has experienced. Mitchell has fought almost 10 times since he and tszyu first fight. He is much more experienced than he was in the first fight and he is hungrier.
that kid in your avatar looks like a straight demon.
How can anyone think the layoff won't hurt Tszyu ?
Did you see his fight with Leija ?
He was easy to hit, & was slow to get off with his less-than-snappy punches.
& that was with Leija.
Mitchell is a far bigger challenge than Leija.
A slick, fast lefty who has been quite acive....& doesn't bust up like Leija.
Mitchell makes Tszyu look awful for a while....hangs tough when Tszyu finally gets going...& wins a unanimous decision.
I am afraid, that this example does not approach: Leija too strongly differs from Mitchell on a manner of conducting a duel. And therefore this example of nothing proves. Spinks was for Tyson more the serious obstacle, than Smith. But Mike knocked out Spinks in the first round, and James could not in general. Foreman too was stronger opponent, than Bonavena, but as we remember a fight with Oscar has taken away more forces at Ali, than a fight with Geordge.
I am afraid, that this example does not approach: Leija too strongly differs from Mitchell on a manner of conducting a duel. And therefore this example of nothing proves. Spinks was for Tyson more the serious obstacle, than Smith. But Mike knocked out Spinks in the first round, and James could not in general. Foreman too was stronger opponent, than Bonavena, but as we remember a fight with Oscar has taken away more forces at Ali, than a fight with Geordge.
wow, this is .... i dunno what it is .... where are you from??
I am afraid, that this example does not approach: Leija too strongly differs from Mitchell on a manner of conducting a duel. And therefore this example of nothing proves. Spinks was for Tyson more the serious obstacle, than Smith. But Mike knocked out Spinks in the first round, and James could not in general. Foreman too was stronger opponent, than Bonavena, but as we remember a fight with Oscar has taken away more forces at Ali, than a fight with Geordge.
Missing my point. I'm not using a "triangle theory".
Just pointing out to those who believe tszyu's inactivity isn't an issue....that it WAS an issue when he fought Leija.
Had he been more active, he'd have handled Leija easily. Instead, he struggled.
Now, after an EVEN LONGER layoff, he's facinga much more difficult fighter in Mitchell...& it's gonna show.
zu can fight and usaully is much stronger but sharba is just as strong i dontthink zu can knock him out or even catch him good to do so if that the case sharmba gone win a decision
Comment