Klitschko Nuthuggers talking about Samuel Peter Rabbit punches

[Derranged]

Now a Wladimir Hating thread.... How original.....

[BrooklynBomber]

You or me didn't make the rules, Both are illegal, why critise one rule yet say the other is okay because "you wouldnt be hospitalized", A heavy big guy clinching a small one is pretty bad considering how many rounds he has been through, Wlad uses his weight on other fighters when holding them while they are tired already.

There is a big difference between the two.

For example you can take two fighters, one smoked marijuana the day before the fight and another was shooting dianabol up his ass for a whole month before the fight. Both weed and steroids are illegal, but who do you thing commints a bigger crime, the guy who smokes weed or the guy who uses steroids?

[RageX]

There is a big difference between the two.

For example you can take two fighters, one smoked marijuana the day before the fight and another was shooting dianabol up his ass for a whole month before the fight. Both weed and steroids are illegal, but who do you thing commints a bigger crime, the guy who smokes weed or the guy who uses steroids?

Okay.


**** Samuel Peter if he Rabbit Punches one more time, he should be disqualified straight away or atleast get points deducted, he only wins because of his rabbit punches and gets KO's because of it. [Completely discrediting him]

Wladimir can hold and hit, and hold repeatedly, he shouldn't get points deducted anyway because clinching doesn't do as much damage, its alright for him to do it, so what if he uses that 250 lbs of weight on 210-220 lbs guys when they are completely exhausted anyway after 6 rounds of being punched, gassed, and clinched repeatedly...


Get the drift?

[The Critic]

Wladimir does not hold and hit. What he does is perfectly legal. Clinching to force a break is legal.

Peter's rabbit punching to me is not as bad as some people say

[Thread Stealer]

You or me didn't make the rules, Both are illegal, why critise one rule yet say the other is okay because "you wouldnt be hospitalized", A heavy big guy clinching a small one is pretty bad considering how many rounds he has been through, Wlad uses his weight on other fighters when holding them while they are tired already.

Because most fighters from time-to-time will bend the rules and use illegal tactics.

But most fouls aren't as dangerous as rabbit-punching.

[The Hammer]

They are both illegal, so why not talk **** about both rather than one?

You're failing to grasp the simple idea that rabbit punching is dangerous. Joe Mesi's brain injury was from a rabbit punch. Max Baer once killed a man in the ring with a rabbit punch. Some people think McClellan's brain damage was caused by a rabbit punch in the second last round of the tragic Benn fight.

I don't like holding either, because it's not entertaining to watch, and many fighters get away with way too much: Ruiz, Skelton, D. Williams, Hawkins, Hopkins etc. The referees do need to enforce the rules against holding. I agree with that part, except Wlad doesn't do it as often as many others, except in the Peter fight.

But someone is going to become seriously brain damaged by Peter's rabbit punching. I'm a bit worried for old Oleg tomorrow night.

I believe referees should be less reluctant to deduct points for fowls, but especially rabbit punches. The referee never even warned Benn when he hit McClellan with the hard, direct rabbit punch in that tragic fight.

[Leo Pradun]

If you complaning about clinching watch Lennox Lewises fights

[beez721]

You or me didn't make the rules, Both are illegal, why critise one rule yet say the other is okay because "you wouldnt be hospitalized", A heavy big guy clinching a small one is pretty bad considering how many rounds he has been through, Wlad uses his weight on other fighters when holding them while they are tired already.

clinching is not illegal and the peter fight was really the only fight were wlad clinched often whereas peter rabbit punches in all his fights. this was a pretty ****** thread. no offense

[GattiFan]

Threadstarter.....

Repeating your question over and over again without responding to the answers to your question...

Makes you look like a ******.

Even MORE than this ****sexual thread already did.

Seriously.

Forgive me...but a couple of scenarios I came up with while reading you repeat your same lame premise over and over in response to several valid points raised by the other members of this fine forum...

I picture you boxing....NEVER clinching to avoid damage...and getting the ever loving ****e BEATEN out of you because you cant grasp the idea that clinching isnt illegal. Excessive holding IS, but its up to the ref to figure out when that line has been crossed.

OR

boxing and having a puncher like peter punch you in the back of your skull every time you clinch untill you are brain dead. Then realizing..THERE IS NO NEED FOR INTERPRETATION BY THE REF BECAUSE IT'S FREAKING ILLEGAL EVERY TIME YOU DO IT. But...alas...you've already been rabbit punched further into ******ation at this point and will never fully grasp what happened.

Much like now.

[Run]

You or me didn't make the rules, Both are illegal, why critise one rule yet say the other is okay because "you wouldnt be hospitalized", A heavy big guy clinching a small one is pretty bad considering how many rounds he has been through, Wlad uses his weight on other fighters when holding them while they are tired already.

K. Read Carefully:

THE REASON PEOPLE COMPLAIN ABOUT PETER'S RABBIT PUNCHES AS OPPOSED TO KLITSCHKO'S HOLDING...........IS BECAUSE OF HOW DANGEROUS THEY ARE. NOBODY CARES ABOUT LEGALITY.

PUNCHING SOMEONE IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND CAN CAUSE PERMANENT DAMAGE.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!