De La is (was) great but he is not Sugar Ray Leonard

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • danny stash
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 1734
    • 171
    • 149
    • 9,037

    #1

    De La is (was) great but he is not Sugar Ray Leonard

    He will not come back and beat Floyd.

    Waste of a great fighter (S) prime-post prime
  • Mr. Ryan
    Guest
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2004
    • 23429
    • 1,301
    • 1,089
    • 29,664

    #2
    That's what makes ODLH so hard to gauge. He has the tools, it's plain to see. He has power, boxing skills, speed, heart, chin, amateur pedigree. He's just found ways to come just short in his biggest performances. Against Whitaker, he was supposed to outwork the older fighter. He did, but looked sloppy. It could happen to anyone, I guess.

    But when he failed to really separate himself from Quartey for most of the fight, then dropped the ball with Tito, alot of doubt came over me. Then he loses twice to Mosley and lays down against Hopkins. He's proven that he's a guy that can't win when he's not expected to.

    I think the same will be the case against Mayweather in the rematch. I think DLH knows he's in with a guy that has more skill and will give it his best. That won't be enough though.

    Comment

    • danny stash
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 1734
      • 171
      • 149
      • 9,037

      #3
      Originally posted by Asian Sensation
      That's what makes ODLH so hard to gauge. He has the tools, it's plain to see. He has power, boxing skills, speed, heart, chin, amateur pedigree. He's just found ways to come just short in his biggest performances. Against Whitaker, he was supposed to outwork the older fighter. He did, but looked sloppy. It could happen to anyone, I guess.

      But when he failed to really separate himself from Quartey for most of the fight, then dropped the ball with Tito, alot of doubt came over me. Then he loses twice to Mosley and lays down against Hopkins. He's proven that he's a guy that can't win when he's not expected to.

      I think the same will be the case against Mayweather in the rematch. I think DLH knows he's in with a guy that has more skill and will give it his best. That won't be enough though.
      very accurate assessment here.

      Comment

      • MELLY-MEL...
        Broken, Beat, Scarred
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 11274
        • 1,059
        • 1,667
        • 33,296

        #4
        Originally posted by Asian Sensation
        That's what makes ODLH so hard to gauge. He has the tools, it's plain to see. He has power, boxing skills, speed, heart, chin, amateur pedigree. He's just found ways to come just short in his biggest performances. Against Whitaker, he was supposed to outwork the older fighter. He did, but looked sloppy. It could happen to anyone, I guess.

        But when he failed to really separate himself from Quartey for most of the fight, then dropped the ball with Tito, alot of doubt came over me. Then he loses twice to Mosley and lays down against Hopkins. He's proven that he's a guy that can't win when he's not expected to.

        I think the same will be the case against Mayweather in the rematch. I think DLH knows he's in with a guy that has more skill and will give it his best. That won't be enough though.
        good post bro!!!!

        Comment

        • potatoes
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 1891
          • 98
          • 0
          • 8,358

          #5
          In a pre-fight interview last year I heard De La Hoya make a correct analysis of what he needed to do to give himself the best chance of beating Mayweather. Pump the jab, cut off the ring, force him into the ropes and make the fight very physical. The problem is he didn't do it. In a post-fight interview De La Hoya was asked why failed to pump the jab etc, his response is that he didn't know why he failed to do it. Should be obvious what the problem is, De La Hoya is too old. His days as a top professional are over and it is time he retired. If he could not get the job done the first time, why should we believe that he will suddenly perform better the second?

          As to whether De La Hoya is as good as Ray Leonard or Ray Robinson is a matter of opinion. It is not always easy to compare men of different eras.

          Comment

          • Zerwas1
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2005
            • 2878
            • 119
            • 205
            • 9,990

            #6
            There are more people who say he won Mosley II than there are who say he lost

            Comment

            • Mr. Ryan
              Guest
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2004
              • 23429
              • 1,301
              • 1,089
              • 29,664

              #7
              If ever there was a guy caught between greatness and immortality, it's De La Hoya.

              Comment

              • warp1432
                the mailman
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 14406
                • 478
                • 347
                • 24,060

                #8
                I agreed with everything except that he layed down against Hopkins. That punched knocked him down. Maybe he didn't want to get up, but he didn't take the fall on purpose.

                Comment

                • Mr. Ryan
                  Guest
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 23429
                  • 1,301
                  • 1,089
                  • 29,664

                  #9
                  Originally posted by warp1432
                  I agreed with everything except that he layed down against Hopkins. That punched knocked him down. Maybe he didn't want to get up, but he didn't take the fall on purpose.
                  The standards of greatness are Ray Robinson, Ray Leonard, and I'll throw Ali out there also. A great fighter gets up when he can't. I don't recall who said that, but it was said. I felt those guys would've gotten up if they were in that situation. I can't prove that DLH laid down because he didn't want to get up, but that's my assessment.

                  Comment

                  • SkillspayBills
                    Garlic Butter Gang!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 29181
                    • 2,155
                    • 3,739
                    • 61,188

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Asian Sensation
                    The standards of greatness are Ray Robinson, Ray Leonard, and I'll throw Ali out there also. A great fighter gets up when he can't. I don't recall who said that, but it was said. I felt those guys would've gotten up if they were in that situation. I can't prove that DLH laid down because he didn't want to get up, but that's my assessment.

                    Dempsey said it and I'm not talking about the movie character.
                    Last edited by SkillspayBills; 03-03-2008, 11:44 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP