I keep hearing this said by people on this forum.
But I don't understand on what grounds they base this argument on.
When you look at the careers of both Boxers then Haye's Competition pisses all over Macca's.
From amateur to Professional.
Even in both their losses it was Haye who lost to a very good seasoned old pro.
Haye has undoubtedly had the better competition in Fragomeni , Bonin , Gurov , Mormeck.....
Macca has ONE HALF-DECENT win over a tired old inactive Braithwaite.
Prior to that he was fighting the likes of Bobby Gunn , Mark Hobson , Roman Bugaj...etc etc etc.
For those of you who think Macca is the better Boxer of the two.... can you please explain how on earth you ever came to that conclusion ?
But I don't understand on what grounds they base this argument on.
When you look at the careers of both Boxers then Haye's Competition pisses all over Macca's.
From amateur to Professional.
Even in both their losses it was Haye who lost to a very good seasoned old pro.
Haye has undoubtedly had the better competition in Fragomeni , Bonin , Gurov , Mormeck.....
Macca has ONE HALF-DECENT win over a tired old inactive Braithwaite.
Prior to that he was fighting the likes of Bobby Gunn , Mark Hobson , Roman Bugaj...etc etc etc.
For those of you who think Macca is the better Boxer of the two.... can you please explain how on earth you ever came to that conclusion ?