Official Bernard Hopkins vs. Joe Calzaghe Poll/Prediction Thread

[Truth]

I should have made this poll public...bigpoppa can you help me?

[Jolly Roger]

I have to back Calzaghe in this one, and i think speed will be the main factor on fight night. There's alot of talk of Hopkins counter punching, but i don't think he will be fast enough to hit JC on a regular basis - certainly not enough to win the fight. Another area i think B-Hop is banking on is his inside game, fighting Joe in the clinch, but i see this as one of Joe's strongest areas so i don't think Bernard will have much of an advantage there - if at all.

[Truth]

Thread Closed Because I Messed Up And Didn't Make The Votes Public. Sorry. THE NEW THREAD IS COMING. I WANT TO KNOW WHO IS PICKING WHO.

[GoodBoxfella]

so he realistically takes a split decision that infers that he might have lost. Excellent.

No I did not say that. I said UD/SD, so that means he'll probably win in a CLOSE fight.

And since when does it mean that you might have lost if you get a Split Decision victory?

Are you one of those people that thinks close fights are complete ROBBERIES?

[Allucard]

Hopkins had trouble with taylor's speed and power. Hokins will have problems with Calzaghe's speed, activity and a`ccuracy. I dont see how Hopkins is going to cope with those 3 things. Hopkins doesnt possess the power to keep Calzaghe back. He doesnt have the speed or the activity rate to keep up. Hopkins is a good boxer, but then so was Kessler. Calzaghe by decision.

Don't forget to mention why Hopkins doesn't have that puch output to beat Calzaghe: Calzaghe is lightning fast and throws over 100 punches a round. So not as people are saying: Hopkins is 43 and shouldn't been fighting in the first place.
Why don't you try to say Calzaghe the best of all time? You sure have the nerve.

[Truth]

Attention: The new thread is available. I ask everybody to revote in the new thread. Thank you, and sorry for the **** up.

[Allucard]

No I did not say that. I said UD/SD, so that means he'll probably win in a CLOSE fight.

And since when does it mean that you might have lost if you get a Split Decision victory?

Are you one of those people that thinks close fights are complete ROBBERIES?

I'm pretty sure that if somehow Calzaghe lost a close decision you feel he won you would too call it a robbery.

[GoodBoxfella]

I'm pretty sure that if somehow Calzaghe lost a close decision you feel he won you would too call it a robbery.

Well lets see. Am I british?

No.

So you're wrong.

[Ramamaiden]

calzaghe by UD. at first i think cal will feel uncomfortable with hopkins, but then he will slowly take control of the fight.

[Truth]

moderators Please Close This Thread!!!!!!!!!i Beg You!!!