Best Trilogy of these Three?

[Thread Stealer]

bowe-holyfield had 3 very good and competitive bouts. it was the best out of the 3. then the 2nd best was the morales-barrera trilogy. it had 2 really good bouts, and all 3 were close, but the 2nd bout was only alright.

gatti-ward only had one competitive bout out of the 3. Gatti schooled ward in the last 2 bouts with one hand.

[Alec900]

Arrrrtuuurooo Thunderrrrr Gattiiiii!!!

[Run]

MAB/Morales.

Because the overall quality level of the fighters, was much much higher.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[Fox McCloud]

bowe-holyfield had 3 very good and competitive bouts. it was the best out of the 3. then the 2nd best was the morales-barrera trilogy. it had 2 really good bouts, and all 3 were close, but the 2nd bout was only alright.

gatti-ward only had one competitive bout out of the 3. Gatti schooled ward in the last 2 bouts with one hand.

You thought Bowe-Holyfield III was more competive and exciting than Barrera-Morales II? I'm shocked! Holyfield only had one good moment in the third fight.

To whoever suggested Gonzalez-Carbajal, I have only seen the first fight.

I voted Barrera-Morales, but everyone already saw my long post on how much I enjoyed it. I just wanted to see if that was the general consensus, or if I needed to go back and watch the other two trilogies to see if I had missed something.

[-Hyperion-]

holyfield-ruiz.....................

[Motofan]

Overall it has to be MAB and EM, but the single best fight was between Gatti and Ward.

[Mr. Ryan]

Barrera-Morales had the most emotion behind a rivalry I can recall. The second fight was a dud though, but I and II were amazing.

Gatti-Ward featured 3 amazing fights, but none of them were for titles or fought at the highest skill level.

Holyfield-Bowe was excellent, but Holyfield had nothing in the third fight.

Of the three, I'd pick the one featured in my sig.

[Fox McCloud]

Barrera-Morales had the most emotion behind a rivalry I can recall. The second fight was a dud though, but I and II were amazing.

Gatti-Ward featured 3 amazing fights, but none of them were for titles or fought at the highest skill level.

Holyfield-Bowe was excellent, but Holyfield had nothing in the third fight.

Of the three, I'd pick the one featured in my sig.

Which, consequently is from the second fight.

Those who think the second fight of Barrera vs. Morales ****** need to watch it again. I just watched it two night ago... I am going through all of my boxing videos and seeing if they have enough replay value for them to keep.

That night I watched two fights.

Barrera-Morales II was good enough for me to keep.
Hamed-Kelley got cut.

So if you thought Barrera-Morales II ******, seriously watch it again, there is a lot to like about that fight.

[Mr. Ryan]

Which, consequently is from the second fight.

Those who think the second fight of Barrera vs. Morales ****** need to watch it again. I just watched it two night ago... I am going through all of my boxing videos and seeing if they have enough replay value for them to keep.

That night I watched two fights.

Barrera-Morales II was good enough for me to keep.
Hamed-Kelley got cut.

So if you thought Barrera-Morales II ******, seriously watch it again, there is a lot to like about that fight.

Being that there was no action for the first 6 rounds, I'd call it the dud of the trilogy. Don't get me wrong, once Barrera started moving his hands, he kicked some aserious ass. If I put all three of the trilogies against each other, that fight stands out as the weakest of them.

[USCowboyHC]

I would go with Ward and Gatti exciting fights!