If Mayweather is the best why are there 4 Welterweight champions?

[My Name Is...]

LMAO! Okay.. so if Mosley isn't a big accomplishment for Cotto then how come De La Hoya who is more inactive and hasnt one a big fight in years is for Mayweather. I tell it like it is.. Your just a biased nuthugger!

Mayweather was great in the lower divisions.. He hasn't done **** at welter!
Don't tell me Mitchell, Bruseles, N'duo, Corley, Sosa, or Gatti were better then Mosley, Quintana, Malignaggi.


And you talk about Judah but Mayweather fought Judah as well coming off a lose to Baldomir.. and Baldomir is a weak as journeymen!

IF ANYTHING COTTOS WIN TO MOSLEY IS BETTER THEN FLOYDS TO DE LA HOYA!
why? because Mosley has been more active and was coming off a win to Collazo.

BTW COTTO BEAT SOME OF THE SAME NAMES MAYWEATHER DID IN A MORE DOMINATING FASHION!

THERE IS ONE ****ING DIFFERENCE. MOSLEY IS REALLY A 140 LB FIGHTER. HE HASNT DONE **** AT WELTER. SO ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT BEATING MOSLEY COMING UP FROM 140 IS BETTER THAN BEATING AT FIGHT AT 154 WHEN YOU ADMITTED YOURSELF AINT DONE **** AT WELTER. YOUR SAYING MAYWEATHER ISNT **** AT WELTER BUT AT 140 HE IS GOOD. SO A FIGHTER BEATS A NATURAL 140 POUNDER (MOSLEY) AT 147 IS BETTER THAN A FIGHTER WHO WAS IN HIS PRIME AT 140 (MAYWEATHER) FIGHTING A FIGHTER AT 154 WITH GLOVES, SIZE, WEIGHT, RING SIZE AGAINST HIM IS BETTER COME ON DUDE. I THINK YOU ARE THE COTTO BIASED NUTHUGGER BECAUSE BEATING A FIGHTER ABOVE YOUR WEIGHT IS ALWAYS BETTER THAN BEATING SOMEONE COMING UP TO FIGHT YOU. PLEASE USE PLAIN AND BASIC COMMON SENSE.