CompuBox Post Analysis: Pavlik-Taylor II

[Jim Jeffries]

compubox can be deceiving as the punches landed could have been weak, not clean or ineffective.

you hit someone with a pillow pitty pat punch 3 times and someone hits you back with a solid hit.. what is worth more?

If weak punches didn't count, your boy Malignaggi would never win a fight.

But seriously, do you think Pavlik hits with pitty pat punches?

[Sin City]

If weak punches didn't count, your boy Malignaggi would never win a fight.

But seriously, do you think Pavlik hits with pitty pat punches?

No I don't but he also didn't land clean.. And yes I know, but Paulie also dominates his fights and doesn't get hit as much as he gives.

[-Hyperion-]

id be generous to give pavlik 6 rounds......

[Jim Jeffries]

No I don't but he also didn't land clean.. And yes I know, but Paulie also dominates his fights and doesn't get hit as much as he gives.

Fair enough, I've never been a fan of Paulie's but he won me over a little in the Cotto fight, and he is a pretty slick boxer.

He caught and hurt Taylor with some clean shots to the body and enough clean shots to the face to almost close one eye and swell the other. Taylor got him with some good jabs and some good counter shots, but he just wasn't busy enough.