I am paying homage to the Barrera-Morales trilogy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fox McCloud
    Mission Complete!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 18176
    • 789
    • 1,151
    • 26,037

    #1

    I am paying homage to the Barrera-Morales trilogy

    First and foremost, I want to give props to the two fighters.

    Marco Antonio Barrera and Erik Morales have more balls than any other pair of fighters I have ever seen face each other.

    Not only that, but they are both masters of all trades. They both have insane technical boxing skills. Great jabs, good counterpunching ability. They could also get in there and fight, really fight. They could hurt their opponent, badly in a variety of ways.

    The thing that made this trilogy as great as it was is that each fight was completely different in every aspect, except for how highly entertaining and exciting they were.

    The first fight was an all-out brawl. Both fighters fought as though they had nothing to lose, as if they were both fighting the 12th round after losing the first 11. They both fought every round that way. Even so, they both showed how GOOD they were at it. They were able to land bombs on one another, and they both made it all the way through 12 rounds. A pretty controversial decision went to the guy who had most of the momentum coming into the fight.

    The second fight was an aggressor vs. counterpuncher fight. For the most part of the early rounds, Barrera played the role of the boxing and moving counterpuncher against the technical aggressor in Morales. Morales won a lot of the rounds, and Barrera decided that maybe he should start coming forward and fighting as the aggressor. After a couple rounds of two aggressors fighting a war, Morales became the counterpuncher who was moving and Barrera became the aggressor who fought with technique. Once again, a very controversial decision went to the guy who had most of the momentum coming into the fight. That evened the score at one a piece. One each, even though most people believed they were given to them in the wrong fights. This fight easily should have gotten FOTY had Micky Ward and Arturo Gatti made an agreement before their first fight not to excercise a single bit of defense for all ten rounds.

    The third fight was high-speed technical chess in the ring, but even fighting this way, Barrera and Morales couldn't figure out a way to make the fight boring. They both stood toe-to-toe, but kept their composure and fought a ridiculously skillful fight. It is a testament to their offensive capabilities that the fight was so entertaining and a testament to their defensive capabilities that neither fighter got stopped.

    This trilogy was absolutely incredible. Both guys showed insane amounts of heart, insane chins, an insane amount of skill, an insane amount of determination.

    Although I haven't seen every trilogy in boxing, this one is far and away the best I have ever seen, beating out the likes of Tarver-Jones, Pacquiao-Morales, Bowe-Holyfield, Gatti-Ward, etc.

    I feel honored that I was able to witness what these two men did in the ring for 36 rounds.
  • QuCongee
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 1925
    • 70
    • 2
    • 2,187

    #2
    MAB won all 3 if you ask me.

    Comment

    • Njord777
      Archaic Pugilist
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 2509
      • 177
      • 9
      • 8,928

      #3
      Originally posted by DWiens421
      First and foremost, I want to give props to the two fighters.

      Marco Antonio Barrera and Erik Morales have more balls than any other pair of fighters I have ever seen face each other.

      Not only that, but they are both masters of all trades. They both have insane technical boxing skills. Great jabs, good counterpunching ability. They could also get in there and fight, really fight. They could hurt their opponent, badly in a variety of ways.

      The thing that made this trilogy as great as it was is that each fight was completely different in every aspect, except for how highly entertaining and exciting they were.

      The first fight was an all-out brawl. Both fighters fought as though they had nothing to lose, as if they were both fighting the 12th round after losing the first 11. They both fought every round that way. Even so, they both showed how GOOD they were at it. They were able to land bombs on one another, and they both made it all the way through 12 rounds. A pretty controversial decision went to the guy who had most of the momentum coming into the fight.

      The second fight was an aggressor vs. counterpuncher fight. For the most part of the early rounds, Barrera played the role of the boxing and moving counterpuncher against the technical aggressor in Morales. Morales won a lot of the rounds, and Barrera decided that maybe he should start coming forward and fighting as the aggressor. After a couple rounds of two aggressors fighting a war, Morales became the counterpuncher who was moving and Barrera became the aggressor who fought with technique. Once again, a very controversial decision went to the guy who had most of the momentum coming into the fight. That evened the score at one a piece. One each, even though most people believed they were given to them in the wrong fights. This fight easily should have gotten FOTY had Micky Ward and Arturo Gatti made an agreement before their first fight not to excercise a single bit of defense for all ten rounds.

      The third fight was high-speed technical chess in the ring, but even fighting this way, Barrera and Morales couldn't figure out a way to make the fight boring. They both stood toe-to-toe, but kept their composure and fought a ridiculously skillful fight. It is a testament to their offensive capabilities that the fight was so entertaining and a testament to their defensive capabilities that neither fighter got stopped.

      This trilogy was absolutely incredible. Both guys showed insane amounts of heart, insane chins, an insane amount of skill, an insane amount of determination.

      Although I haven't seen every trilogy in boxing, this one is far and away the best I have ever seen, beating out the likes of Tarver-Jones, Pacquiao-Morales, Bowe-Holyfield, Gatti-Ward, etc.

      I feel honored that I was able to witness what these two men did in the ring for 36 rounds.
      I have to say I hate when I try and say something on these forums with clarity, passion and intelligence and it's ignored- so I can't let the same fate befall you. This isn't the type of post where you need me to add anything- you've said all there is to say. You're right, the trilogy was amazing and when you see two true warriors add such a proud epic to the annuls of boxing it's a beautiful thing. You're completely right- awesome post, Dwiens.

      Comment

      • Silencers
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 21957
        • 505
        • 235
        • 32,983

        #4
        Barrera should have won the first, Morales the second, the judges finally got it right for the third fight. It was a great trilogy. Good post.

        Comment

        • BennyST
          Shhhh...
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 9263
          • 1,036
          • 500
          • 21,301

          #5
          Great post Dwiens. It's not too often you see someone that is willing to give credit to both fighters for giving us such an amazing trilogy. There is always someone who has to bag out one of the fighters even though it takes two to make a fight. More than that though, it takes two very special fighters to give us a trilogy the likes of what they gave us.

          As you said, I don't think I've been lucky enough to see a better trilogy of fights than that. We should all give much props to both fighters for being willing to go through what they went through. I think it was obvious that by the end of the last fight Morales was never going to be the same after what he had given in those fights.

          Both were true warriors and a pair of the best and most exciting fighters of the last two decades.

          Comment

          • Fox McCloud
            Mission Complete!
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 18176
            • 789
            • 1,151
            • 26,037

            #6
            Thank you very much for everyone who had kind words. It revives my faith that there is intelligence left in this board.

            Do you all really want to know the craziest thing about this? I have already made the decision to keep all the fights I get of my favorite fighter (Casamayor, Forrest and Wright) and all the Fight of the Years that I can get. I have been trying to go through and watch all of the fights I have on my computer that doesn't fall into one of the above mentioned categories. Tonight, the one that my computer randomly selected was Barrera-Morales II, and that (considered by most to be the low point of the trilogy) was what got me so excited and passionate about this.

            I find it incredible the the low point of these guys' trilogy is better than 99% of all fights that have ever happened.

            Comment

            • Silencers
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 21957
              • 505
              • 235
              • 32,983

              #7
              Originally posted by DWiens421
              Thank you very much for everyone who had kind words. It revives my faith that there is intelligence left in this board.

              Do you all really want to know the craziest thing about this? I have already made the decision to keep all the fights I get of my favorite fighter (Casamayor, Forrest and Wright) and all the Fight of the Years that I can get. I have been trying to go through and watch all of the fights I have on my computer that doesn't fall into one of the above mentioned categories. Tonight, the one that my computer randomly selected was Barrera-Morales II, and that (considered by most to be the low point of the trilogy) was what got me so excited and passionate about this.

              I find it incredible the the low point of these guys' trilogy is better than 99% of all fights that have ever happened.
              The second fight was more tactical than the first and third but was still a good fight.

              Comment

              • Fox McCloud
                Mission Complete!
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 18176
                • 789
                • 1,151
                • 26,037

                #8
                Originally posted by silencers98
                The second fight was more tactical than the first and third but was still a good fight.
                Like I said, I was nervously excited even when Barrera was backing up and playing the counterpuncher. They are both so accurate that they made every single punch count, and they both have such good chins that they could make every punch count and act like nothing happened.

                People say Castillo and Corrales or Vazquez and Marquez were made for each other, but I saw Castillo get the better of Corrales after two fights, and I think Vazquez definately is cumulatively leading over Marquez after two.

                I honestly still am not even sure that Barrera really got the better of Morales, even though he took two out of three. I think we really did see the perfect matchup between these two fighters.

                Comment

                • kg21mvp
                  QC's Finest
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 0
                  • 129
                  • 151
                  • 13,182

                  #9
                  my hats of to two of mexico's greatest warriors!

                  i was not into boxing yet at that time when they fought the first time bet when i saw a preview of the 2nd fight then damn these two boxers tear each other apart and i have been a fan ever since

                  Comment

                  • tyson
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 5344
                    • 317
                    • 435
                    • 13,084

                    #10
                    This right here is the reason I'm still checking in on boxingscene once in a while. Awesome post Dwiens, your excitement shines right through in every sentence.
                    If I read **** this passionate and well-written in every post, I'd never leave the computer.
                    Great stuff, and I agree with your points too, though that has nothing to do with the fact that this is great writing.

                    Keep it up!

                    I would green karma you if could, but I need to spread some love first.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP