Ring Generalship & effective aggresiveness

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferocity
    NOV. 3, NEW CHAMPION
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 15629
    • 313
    • 257
    • 23,031

    #11
    Just finished watching the fight.

    I got Pavlik winning by 2 rounds. After the tenth round i had an even fight. Then Pavlik walked away with the 11 and 12 rounds. I gave Taylor 4 questionable rounds and i gave Pavlik 1 questionable round.

    Had Taylor keep pumping the jab he'd have won the fight. A guy with a good jab is going to give Pavlik hell.

    It was a good fight and Taylor looked good better then he has in a long time. For this fight his Olympic trainer would have been the way to go as he is the one that used to have Taylor using the jab in over time.

    Pavlik v. Taylor wtf? Lets allow Calzaghe to prove his worth and beat Hopkins then move up and be light heavyweight Champion.

    Comment

    • 215Chaingang
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 510
      • 21
      • 0
      • 6,581

      #12
      taylor was not Superior Ring General. ring generalship is based on who is control the ring. that was kelly. ya'll know damn well taylor is not no counterpuncher. put the drinks down. he fought in spurts it seemed like always around 1:30-1:23 in the round. it not like taylor was setting any traps. he was better defensively but that only 1 out of 3. he was landing the harder telling shots when actually fought. but the key is kelly landing constiently thru the rounds. taylor was like the phoneix suns and kelly was like the spurs

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP