What a ****ing robbery!!!
Collapse
-
-
How is he hype? He first KO'd Jermaine, which was the first time anyone had ever done. Then where Hopkins and Wright failed, he UD'd Jermaine. You talk about all this bull**** how he's hype and how Jermaine won the fight. The only people complaining about the loss are biased trolls. I thought you were a decent poster who knew his stuff, guess not...Comment
-
This is the last time i'm going to make a post on this fight as I don't really care for either fighter. This fight was NOT a robbery. It was a close fight, which could have gone either way depending on how you yourself judge fights. Me, I scored the fight 115-113 for Pavlik. I personally score rounds for the fighter who presses the action, over a fighter who is only active in spurts.
Boxing is unlike the majority of sports where the result can be challanged and argued about. But just because someone doesn't agree with your scorecard doesn't make them a ****** and incapable of scoring fights. I have seen some posts saying things such as "If you scored the fight for Pavlik you are dillusional", what a load of bull****.Comment
-
Ok not as much hype as say Margarito and Williams was, I just meant that he suddenly has a whole new brand of band wagon fans. Like Cotto does. Not so much hype then just it seems that so many have become his like number one fans for the day.How is he hype? He first KO'd Jermaine, which was the first time anyone had ever done. Then where Hopkins and Wright failed, he UD'd Jermaine. You talk about all this bull**** how he's hype and how Jermaine won the fight. The only people complaining about the loss are biased trolls. I thought you were a decent poster who knew his stuff, guess not...Comment
-
Well, what else do you expect to happen when you beat the king at Middleweight twice?Comment
-
you guys need to get over it! the **** is over, he lost 2x. kelly is just the better man! this **** is old! good fight that was close, but pavlik won! no one wants to mention how taylor was closer in his 2 fights with bhop, and fight with winky, and spinks than this fight was. well, why not? if ur gonna cry about this than u can not leave those fights out! why don't you mention how taylor threw a mere 37 punches per rd. less than a ****ing heavy! or how he was gassed out after 7 and did ****! or how he was most likely saved in the 11th by the bell and was on his way to another ko. well, why? wanna blame somebody? blame taylor, he lost! not pavlik, or the judges, jermaine ****ing taylor! this is the problem with much of people today, they look to pass the buck, blame everything, and everyone, yet they fail to ever take responsiblity for their actions, and point the finger at the one that really matters and who controls their destiny. it's called manning the **** up!!!!!!!!! lost art!
__________________Comment
-
I scored it 115-113 for Pavlik. Some people on here throw around the term "robbery" so loosely that it doesn't really mean **** anyway. Most of the people in here crying that Taylor was robbed, are just pissed because their guy didn't win, and they need an out. So since the fight was close, clearly their guy should have won, and since he didn't, then he must've been robbed. Get the **** over it already. Pavlik won that fight. It was close, to suggest a robbery is ****ing ******.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment