surprised HE said the he thought he lost rounds 2-6. but from 7-12 he was in charge. If he thought that, than with his logic JT should have won. Because after 6 it was 5-1 JT. Well all JT had to do was win 1 of those last 6 round for a draw and 2 for the win. What do you guys think of this when JT clearly won 2 of the last 6 rounds?
surprised HE said the he thought he lost rounds 2-6. but from 7-12 he was in charge. If he thought that, than with his logic JT should have won. Because after 6 it was 5-1 JT. Well all JT had to do was win 1 of those last 6 round for a draw and 2 for the win. What do you guys think of this when JT clearly won 2 of the last 6 rounds?
Well there's absolutely no way Taylor won more than one of the last six, and Pavlik clearly won the first. Rounds 2-6 were all close, and you'd have to give them ALL to Taylor to get a draw. If you split them, Pavlik takes eight rounds.
surprised HE said the he thought he lost rounds 2-6. but from 7-12 he was in charge. If he thought that, than with his logic JT should have won. Because after 6 it was 5-1 JT. Well all JT had to do was win 1 of those last 6 round for a draw and 2 for the win. What do you guys think of this when JT clearly won 2 of the last 6 rounds?
He said that after the fight off the top of his head, he said he needed to watch the fight though.
JT lost the fight no question. But It looks like we are going to be revisiting the robbery claims again tonight.
Comment