Pavlik VS Taylor II: Good or Bad Judges?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rane-Ex54
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 934
    • 34
    • 8
    • 7,276

    #1

    Pavlik VS Taylor II: Good or Bad Judges?

    How did ya'll score the fight? Did you think the judges did well? I was nervous they were somehow going to give it to Taylor, when I had it 116-112 for Pavlik, especially because of the scores from there first fight.
  • aristotlemoses
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 4372
    • 92
    • 71
    • 11,672

    #2
    the 117-111 judge was horrible. the ***** got it right though.
    the judges from the first fight were kinda iffy to. the one ***** had it 59-54 whcih i thought was way off.

    Comment

    • TheGreatA
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 14143
      • 633
      • 271
      • 21,863

      #3
      There were two atrocious judges, the one who scored the Mijares vs Navarro fight 120-108 for Navarro and the one who scored the Pavlik vs Taylor fight 117-111 for Pavlik. Other than that it was good.

      Comment

      • Rane-Ex54
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 934
        • 34
        • 8
        • 7,276

        #4
        Originally posted by TheManchine
        There were two atrocious judges, the one who scored the Mijares vs Navarro fight 120-108 for Navarro and the one who scored the Pavlik vs Taylor fight 117-111 for Pavlik. Other than that it was good.
        Yeah I agree, that 120-108 for Navarro, was super ridiculous. Were they even watching? To me, the 117-111 for Pav was a lil off, but nothing atrocious.

        Comment

        • TheGreatA
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 14143
          • 633
          • 271
          • 21,863

          #5
          Originally posted by Rane-Ex54
          Yeah I agree, that 120-108 for Navarro, was super ridiculous. Were they even watching? To me, the 117-111 for Pav was a lil off, but nothing atrocious.
          To me, that fight was decided in the last two rounds of the fight (which Pavlik took easily) but the judge who scored it 117-111 didn't give Taylor a chance to get even a draw.

          That's why I thought it was pretty bad, you could've easily scored most of the early rounds for either man. Seems like that guy just scored every close round for Pavlik.

          But it doesn't compare to the ridiculous score that was 120-108 for Navarro. Hopefully that judge will never score another fight again.

          http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...1571&cat=judge
          This guy was the judge.
          He also scored the Barrera vs Marquez fight almost a shutout victory for Marquez, the DaVarryl Williamson vs Wladimir Klitschko fight for Williamson, Montell Griffin vs James Toney fight shutout victory for Griffin.
          How the hell does this guy get to keep his job???
          Last edited by TheGreatA; 02-17-2008, 01:47 PM.

          Comment

          • bishop2006
            Pound For Pound
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2006
            • 5301
            • 175
            • 0
            • 12,214

            #6
            Originally posted by TheManchine
            There were two atrocious judges, the one who scored the Mijares vs Navarro fight 120-108 for Navarro and the one who scored the Pavlik vs Taylor fight 117-111 for Pavlik. Other than that it was good.
            I agree,Pavlik won,but not 117-111,i had it 116-113

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP