good article they need better undercards people dont wanna dish out 50 bucks just for one main event thats why ufc does better by putting exciting fights on the same card in boxing no one goes tot he undercards in ufc people are there from the first card to the last.
Kelly Pavlik-Jermain Taylor Undercard Not Drawing Crowd at MGM Grand
Michael David SmithPosted Feb 16th 2008 9:28PM by Michael David Smith
Filed under: Boxing
Once the Kelly Pavlik-Jermain Taylor fight begins, I'll be live blogging it. But I'm not live blogging the undercard for a very simple reason: No one cares about boxing undercards.
And that's a shame. As I've written before, one of the reasons that UFC has surged in popularity is that fans don't feel like they're shelling out 40 or 50 bucks to watch one fight. A UFC pay-per-view show always has a slate of undercard fights that gets the crowd into a lather, and even if the main event turns out to be a disappointment, few fans think they've gotten ripped off.
That just isn't the case with boxing. I'm currently watching the Ronald Hearns-Juan Astorga undercard fight, and well under half of the seats at the MGM Grand are filled. Most of the people who are in the stands are talking on the phone, talking to each other, or staring blankly into space. No one cares. That picture of a bored-looking Thomas "Hitman" Hearns isn't from watching his son fight tonight, but it might as well be.
The second and third fights of the undercard will be better fights -- Large at Sporting Blog is praising HBO for the card it put together. But I can practically guarantee that the fans won't be enthusiastic about the next two fights, either. The lack of interest in undercards is bad for boxing.
Kelly Pavlik-Jermain Taylor Undercard Not Drawing Crowd at MGM Grand
Michael David SmithPosted Feb 16th 2008 9:28PM by Michael David Smith
Filed under: Boxing
Once the Kelly Pavlik-Jermain Taylor fight begins, I'll be live blogging it. But I'm not live blogging the undercard for a very simple reason: No one cares about boxing undercards.
And that's a shame. As I've written before, one of the reasons that UFC has surged in popularity is that fans don't feel like they're shelling out 40 or 50 bucks to watch one fight. A UFC pay-per-view show always has a slate of undercard fights that gets the crowd into a lather, and even if the main event turns out to be a disappointment, few fans think they've gotten ripped off.
That just isn't the case with boxing. I'm currently watching the Ronald Hearns-Juan Astorga undercard fight, and well under half of the seats at the MGM Grand are filled. Most of the people who are in the stands are talking on the phone, talking to each other, or staring blankly into space. No one cares. That picture of a bored-looking Thomas "Hitman" Hearns isn't from watching his son fight tonight, but it might as well be.
The second and third fights of the undercard will be better fights -- Large at Sporting Blog is praising HBO for the card it put together. But I can practically guarantee that the fans won't be enthusiastic about the next two fights, either. The lack of interest in undercards is bad for boxing.
Comment