Pavlik Repeats, Outpoints Taylor in Las Vegas

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • J90
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 698
    • 65
    • 98
    • 7,099

    #261
    What an educating thread

    Comment

    • boxingknight
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 482
      • 26
      • 0
      • 572

      #262
      The mods already deleted your other trolling topics, what the hell. Topic creator is bipolar as hell.

      Comment

      • Lucky13
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 1801
        • 76
        • 100
        • 2,019

        #263
        This thread's intellect level is higher than the people who picked Taylor to win.

        Comment

        • seebert
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 149
          • 10
          • 1
          • 6,388

          #264
          Originally posted by kayjay
          :lo1: Will it ever stop?
          Would not have mattered in the result. Not "would not have been considered in the scoring." SO, yes even if you gave better defense to Taylor, Pavlik still has the edge overall and deserved a close unanimous nod. If the fight was judged on pure athletic ability, Taylor would win, buts its not. He may be a world class athlete but not a fighter, not if he can lose to a skinny, hard working white boy.

          Comment

          • the330ballers
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2006
            • 1337
            • 20
            • 10
            • 7,865

            #265
            Originally posted by SayWhatAgain
            Just curious, where do you watch from? I watched at a bar in AZ... Bars pay a premium to make it legal here.
            yeah i remember reading something about bars having to pay like 2000 to watch a PPV fight. im surprised that some place did that.

            i just watch from home.. i dont think theres any place around me that would televise the fight

            Comment

            • Mag5
              Amateur
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 4
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,013

              #266
              I should also add that ESPN.com scored it 114-114. This was Dan Rafael's opinion, among others. Scoring points with weak-hand jabs can win fights, apparently, if you appear to be the "aggressor," but Taylor was certainly the cleaner, quicker, more effective boxer.

              Comment

              • v.cassiusali@ya
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 3659
                • 55
                • 0
                • 13,298

                #267
                does anybody dare to talk about doug tucker's (referee: mijares-castillo) scorecard? boy, some referee must be dreaming during the fight! why should the boxing body tolerate the ignorance of some judges?? why are they allowed to referee in this sport? referee like tucker should find his place somewhere. maybe in WWE. poor officiating really hurt boxing.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP