Judges are a Disgrace

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cuauhtémoc1520
    Head Mexican in Charge
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 20824
    • 1,666
    • 569
    • 35,996

    #31
    The thing that's most impressive about Pavlik is that he is decievingly strong. Taylor is a fighter that has made a career on "bullying" people backwards, he couldn't do that against Pavlik.

    I will admit, Taylor was landing the harder punches and more effective jabs but Pavlik was just throwing the jab alot more and threw taylor off with just having it in his face.

    Taylor wasn't busy enough, bottom line. If you can't see that you are blinded by your love for taylor. Pavlik's conditioning in insane, he kept the same pace for 12 rounds and that's what won him the fight.

    If your going to have Taylor's style of fighting, you have to be busy. It's a style that dictates for you to be busy and not pot shotting whenever you get your energy back. taylor looked very good in spurts but just couldn't do it enough throught the fight to win it.

    There were times where Taylor seemed to not throw punches for minutes at a time, you can't win a fight like that and I think it was due to conditioning.

    Comment

    • GooGoo
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 778
      • 408
      • 265
      • 943

      #32
      Originally posted by ICEMAN JOHN SCULLY
      Hard to get a close decisionwhen compubox has you landing about 100 LESS punches and throwing HALF as many, though.
      Did you actually believe those compubox numbers, it sure didn't look like that in my eyes.

      What I saw, was Taylor landing more punches and the crisper punches, Taylor also won the jabbing contest.

      Seriously, those compubox numbers were way off and I'm not ****** to be fooled by those numbers like many people.

      Horrible judging in this fight, Taylor was clearly robbed.

      Comment

      • Balzy
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 9
        • 1
        • 0
        • 6,027

        #33
        Originally posted by Ryno113
        All of the scoring tonight was ridiculous really it was. Pavlik-Taylor was much closer than the cards showed i actually had Taylor win but by a single round but it could have gone either way tbh.

        The Navarro scoring WTF?!
        12 rounds to Navaro seriously?

        They need a new system, i'm tired of seeing **** judges.
        Seriously, I felt the same way about Pavlik-Taylor II. Only one Judge scored it close to what the fight really was (Jarman; 115-113). The fight could've gone either way, don't get me wrong Taylor lost this fight, but not by the lopsided scores the two other judges administered. I don't know what their criteria is anymore, and this bum Ledderman is horrible...Can you believe he had Paul Williams winning by 5 points against Quintana last week?? On Sat night he had Pavlik by 5-6 points as well. I don't get it, I just don't know what these judges look for in scoring each round.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP