PAVLIK, TAYLOR BOTH MAKE WEIGHT

[2501]

I wanna see the pics.

a/s/l?????

[sparked_85]

I don't mean to be racist but black boxers always look more ripped.

Ricky Hatton looked tremendous against Floyd, ripped as ****.

[ELPacman]

Not always.

LMAO!

[Steak]

heres the video yall

http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/video/videopage?videoId=3248305&categoryId=2491554

[boxingknight]

heres the video yall
http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/...goryId=2491554

Thank you for that

[RightHandLead]

Not always.

Nice comparisons.

[2501]

heres the video yall
http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/...goryId=2491554

wiered they actually look thinner to me.

[MELLY-MEL...]

i just looked at the 1st fight pics, and really they both look the same!

[boxingknight]

I don't notice a huge difference, but then again theres only 4 pound weight difference since neither came in at 166. I'm sure when fight night comes, they both will look huge like they did last time. I think pavliks face is fuller and he doesn't look as much as a skeleton this time

[Thread Stealer]

Ricky Hatton looked tremendous against Floyd, ripped as ****.

Not as ripped as Mayweather.

Having a better physique means **** all in the ring, but there is some truth about genetics and skin tone in terms of them looking more cut.

Darker/tanner skin does make one look more defined.

And then there's genetics when it comes to some fighters, like Mexican fighters. Besides Fernando Vargas on steroids, how often do you see a really cut Mexican? Salvador Sanchez was reasonably cut, and Oscar De La Fishnet was against Floyd Mayweather, but it's still a small number, and far away from fighters like Roy Jones or Frank Bruno.