Explain this to me...

[rebmogul]

yeah good point not good for improving boxings reputation of being purely about greed and corruption if the man who owns it is motivated to keep himself on the top list when he clearly is not in the top 10 it just shows an example of why its not good for a promoter to control a source of boxing media, sure its there opinion, but *****g him at 3 because "he's the only one who tested Floyd" is ridiculous

The easiest way to end that is stop reading it. I've read ring and other boxing litterature for years and IMO, I've learned more here and others places on the net.

Let's just see these ******s put him in their top 10 when the same jr. welter tears his ass up again? As if anybody, who knows anything about boxing doesn't know Floyd will put it on him worse this time...

[jawsmafia]

exactly, i have found better sources of fair boxing info like this site for example