Golota v Douglas ,who wins are the best day

[Thread Stealer]

i'll go with douglas because golota was such a headcase. he found ways to lose.

he should have lost against pouha also when he bit him.

[slicksouthpaw16]

It's gonna be more of an outside fighting fight, Douglass had that devastating uppercut. Buster was trippling-up on the jab accurately and always had a nice right hand behind it. Buster also has the better reach, but both guys are just about the same frame. I'd favor Douglass.

The only reason why you pick Douglas is because he beat Tyson. Look at it like this, Tyson was the only top 10 name fighter that Douglas ever beat. Why? because Tyson was simply overrated and exposed as the overhyped fighter that he was. If Golota keeps his head, i see him scoring a late KO. He has that great left jab right hand combination and would control Douglas from the outside.

Also, the reason why Douglas was trippling up on the jab is because Tyson was right there in range to get hit because he was discouraged (as always) from Douglas fighting him back. Golota would definatley keep him at bay.

[Derranged]

Douglass by KO.

[Dynamite Kid]

The only reason why you pick Douglas is because he beat Tyson. Look at it like this, Tyson was the only top 10 name fighter that Douglas ever beat. Why? because Tyson was simply overrated and exposed as the overhyped fighter that he was. If Golota keeps his head, i see him scoring a late KO. He has that great left jab right hand combination and would control Douglas from the outside.

Also, the reason why Douglas was trippling up on the jab is because Tyson was right there in range to get hit because he was discouraged (as always) from Douglas fighting him back. Golota would definatley keep him at bay.

just read the Tyson v Ike thread it reminded me of how imature yaman really is he gets so pissed off when u say anything negative about Mike its almost funny

[MELLY-MEL...]

Andrew wins all day long!

[slicksouthpaw16]

just read the Tyson v Ike thread it reminded me of how imature yaman really is he gets so pissed off when u say anything negative about Mike its almost funny

Exactly, only a biased poster will get that mad if another poster says anything about thier fighter. There is no way in the world Tyson would beat Ike. Not only is Ike more skilled, bigger, stronger, and better technically sound, but he also has alot more heart and stamina, Ike did not get tired. I would also to pick the Tua that fought Ike to beat Tyson.
[vBTube]rQStB2IRWOo[/vBTube]

[Dynamite Kid]

Exactly, only a biased poster will get that mad if another poster says anything about thier fighter. There is no way in the world Tyson would beat Ike. Not only is Ike more skilled, bigger, stronger, and better technically sound, but he also has alot more heart and stamina, Ike did not get tired. I would also to pick the Tua that fought Ike to beat Tyson.
[vBTube]rQStB2IRWOo[/vBTube]

what about the big ****in essays he writes to respond to your posts that alone lets u know he is a nuthugger and that u have rattled him then he trots out the u know nothing about Boxing in his sarcastic petulent way

he is

[slicksouthpaw16]

what about the big ****in essays he writes to respond to your posts that alone lets u know he is a nuthugger and that u have rattled him then he trots out the u know nothing about Boxing in his sarcastic petulent way

he is

He always does that and he has the nerve to tell me that i do it to deney a lost cause..lol. He is the one that is getting discouraged in debates.

[Dynamite Kid]

He always does that and he has the nerve to tell me that i do it to deney a lost cause..lol. He is the one that is getting discouraged in debates.

Big yourself up slicksouthpaw u owned the mother ****a big time there ,remind me never to start an argument with u

__________________________________________________ ______

i really enjoy proving people like you wrong, i do it all the time so i am use to this. see thats how i know that you can not prove that Tyson could beat Ike. you wright all of these paragraphs but don't get into comparing styles. again, how can Tyson cope with the ability, skill, stamina, and punch volume of Ike. the man set records for heavyweights for throwing all of those punches. he had the best stamina i have seen for a heavyweight. and why can't you give me a great fighter that Tyson beat in thier prime? don't try to say that Holmes was still a great fighter, don't be silly. he was past his prime and scared so you can toss that one out. Holmes would eat Tyson for lunch if they fought in thier primes. and not only was M. Spinks past his prime, but he was also past his prime fighting weight. he was at his prime when he was a light heavyweight. he had no buisness being in the ring with Tyson. and if you know soooooo much, then tell me why everytime Tyson stepped up with real fighters, he was always knocked out? and about Dawson vs Jones. Dawson has every tool to beat Roy. and why are you twisting MY words up? you are just trying to make me sound ******. you have to try harder kid because i do not get discourged in a thread. i am experienced when it comes to debating about boxing. if you would read corectly, you would have read that i said that Dawson would out point Roy. i was joking about him knocking him out. prime Roy was just a middleweight or supermiddleweight so Dawson would have size advantage and a 3 inch height advangage. Roy has always had trouble with southpaw boxers. (Tarver) and Dawson is 10 times the fighter that Tarver is. and its so funny how you actually come on a forum and think you actumatically know more than the other poster son. you really need to do research. and i don't know what makes you think im a kid, i have 25 years of boxing knowledge so go figure. anwser the questions that i asked in this post and i might take you seriously. Oh and the last thing, why aren't Tua and Byrd on the same level as Tyson? Tua has knocked out about 5 future world champions and he was past his prime when he did it. and Ike is the one that broke the spirit of prime Tua. when Ike took all of his shots and came back with his his own combo's, Tua was discourge and was not hungry any more after that. I would give PRIME Tua a good chance against Tyson as well. when Tua trained properly and was in shape, he was a force to be reckoned with. Massive power, decent speed, and good combinations, and he definatley had a better chin and heart than Tyson did. he would out work Tyson and stop him late in my opinion. you can not tell me that Tyson would actually take all of the shots that Tua did in the Ike fight. he was nowhere near tough as Tua was. and Byrd was a beast also. Im not sure if i would favor him over Tyson or not but he accomplished some great things in boxing. after Ike beat him, he went on to become a 2 time world champion. actually Tyson was only a 2 or 3 time champ so how is he on a different level than Byrd or Tua? trust me, do not believe the hype kid. Tyson was a good fighter but he was not a great. his greatest claim to fame is becoming the youngest heavyweight champ of all time. but outside of that, he really did not accomplished alot. like i said before, every time he stepped up, he always crumbled in his biggest fights. with Evander Holyfield, Tyson's people choose him because they thought that he was done because he looked shot in his last few fights. what happened? Holyfield dominated Tyson twice and Holyfield was past his prime. and i see that you are still trying to give Tyson credit for the Douglas lost. and why is this? so what if he showed heart or what ever you are tyring to say. when you are a 42 to 1 favorite, showing heart and getting up against the underdog is not a thing to be bragging about. that was one of if not the biggest upset of all time. he deserves no credit. that fight is the perfect example of being exposed. Douglass showed everybody that Tyson fought down the road, that if you hang in there and give Tyson a hard fight, he will break down mentally. and don't tell me that Tyson was past his prime because he was not. he was undefeated and he was the heavyweight champion of the world. how was he past his prime? Now about Ike, this man was on his way to greatness, he had the look of a champion, potential, heart, will, cast iron chin, volume punching, and stamina to match. you cannot doubt this fighter. i remember when his people was just talking about a possible fight with Tyson or Lennox and they both actually tried to avoid him because he was so dangerous. and if you don't believe that they avoided him, i can actually go and try to find the article if you want me too. i have no reason to lie. i know boxing man, you can not tell me nothing that i don't already know. and this is out of my character and i don't usually do this but

[slicksouthpaw16]

Big yourself up slicksouthpaw u owned the mother ****a big time there ,remind me nevr to start an argument with u

__________________________________________________ ______

i really enjoy proving people like you wrong, i do it all the time so i am use to this. see thats how i know that you can not prove that Tyson could beat Ike. you wright all of these paragraphs but don't get into comparing styles. again, how can Tyson cope with the ability, skill, stamina, and punch volume of Ike. the man set records for heavyweights for throwing all of those punches. he had the best stamina i have seen for a heavyweight. and why can't you give me a great fighter that Tyson beat in thier prime? don't try to say that Holmes was still a great fighter, don't be silly. he was past his prime and scared so you can toss that one out. Holmes would eat Tyson for lunch if they fought in thier primes. and not only was M. Spinks past his prime, but he was also past his prime fighting weight. he was at his prime when he was a light heavyweight. he had no buisness being in the ring with Tyson. and if you know soooooo much, then tell me why everytime Tyson stepped up with real fighters, he was always knocked out? and about Dawson vs Jones. Dawson has every tool to beat Roy. and why are you twisting MY words up? you are just trying to make me sound ******. you have to try harder kid because i do not get discourged in a thread. i am experienced when it comes to debating about boxing. if you would read corectly, you would have read that i said that Dawson would out point Roy. i was joking about him knocking him out. prime Roy was just a middleweight or supermiddleweight so Dawson would have size advantage and a 3 inch height advangage. Roy has always had trouble with southpaw boxers. (Tarver) and Dawson is 10 times the fighter that Tarver is. and its so funny how you actually come on a forum and think you actumatically know more than the other poster son. you really need to do research. and i don't know what makes you think im a kid, i have 25 years of boxing knowledge so go figure. anwser the questions that i asked in this post and i might take you seriously. Oh and the last thing, why aren't Tua and Byrd on the same level as Tyson? Tua has knocked out about 5 future world champions and he was past his prime when he did it. and Ike is the one that broke the spirit of prime Tua. when Ike took all of his shots and came back with his his own combo's, Tua was discourge and was not hungry any more after that. I would give PRIME Tua a good chance against Tyson as well. when Tua trained properly and was in shape, he was a force to be reckoned with. Massive power, decent speed, and good combinations, and he definatley had a better chin and heart than Tyson did. he would out work Tyson and stop him late in my opinion. you can not tell me that Tyson would actually take all of the shots that Tua did in the Ike fight. he was nowhere near tough as Tua was. and Byrd was a beast also. Im not sure if i would favor him over Tyson or not but he accomplished some great things in boxing. after Ike beat him, he went on to become a 2 time world champion. actually Tyson was only a 2 or 3 time champ so how is he on a different level than Byrd or Tua? trust me, do not believe the hype kid. Tyson was a good fighter but he was not a great. his greatest claim to fame is becoming the youngest heavyweight champ of all time. but outside of that, he really did not accomplished alot. like i said before, every time he stepped up, he always crumbled in his biggest fights. with Evander Holyfield, Tyson's people choose him because they thought that he was done because he looked shot in his last few fights. what happened? Holyfield dominated Tyson twice and Holyfield was past his prime. and i see that you are still trying to give Tyson credit for the Douglas lost. and why is this? so what if he showed heart or what ever you are tyring to say. when you are a 42 to 1 favorite, showing heart and getting up against the underdog is not a thing to be bragging about. that was one of if not the biggest upset of all time. he deserves no credit. that fight is the perfect example of being exposed. Douglass showed everybody that Tyson fought down the road, that if you hang in there and give Tyson a hard fight, he will break down mentally. and don't tell me that Tyson was past his prime because he was not. he was undefeated and he was the heavyweight champion of the world. how was he past his prime? Now about Ike, this man was on his way to greatness, he had the look of a champion, potential, heart, will, cast iron chin, volume punching, and stamina to match. you cannot doubt this fighter. i remember when his people was just talking about a possible fight with Tyson or Lennox and they both actually tried to avoid him because he was so dangerous. and if you don't believe that they avoided him, i can actually go and try to find the article if you want me too. i have no reason to lie. i know boxing man, you can not tell me nothing that i don't already know. and this is out of my character and i don't usually do this but

lol,