Hatton vs Williams

[Mozza]

So he blew out Urango like he did Castillo??? a ****ing prospect at 17-0?? He couldnt take a bodyshot that urango threw, He hug and cling his way to victory..yeah thats a really 11 rounds win..


Masterclass Boxing Hatton/Urango.........LOL.....Hatton won 11 rounds....LOL, you must have borrowed steve wonders glasses that night.

The judges must have been wearing those glasses as well because that's exactly how they scored it.

[Ray*]

Williams as in Paul Williams right?? Hatton wouldnt have a prayer.

LOL, yeah PAUL WILLIAMS..the man with the same reach as Wlad klistchko??? some of this hatton fans really can deal with reality.

[Ray*]

The judges must have been wearing those glasses as well because that's exactly how they scored it.

Yes they did, Its called HBO fighter, Like the gift they gave him against Collazo.

[Mozza]

Yes they did, Its called HBO fighter, Like the gift they gave him against Collazo.

Ah, right. That will be the gift decision Hatton got against an American fighter in America. Good one.

[Silencers]

Williams easily.

[Ray*]

Ah, right. That will be the gift decision Hatton got against an American fighter in America. Good one.

Yep...He got an hometown decision because he is the House fighter NOT collazo....Imagine if the fight was in Manchester and Collazo was the challenger like Hatton was, You lot would have been screaming blue moon murder if they give Collazo the decision.

[Crazylegs77]

LOL, yeah PAUL WILLIAMS..the man with the same reach as Wlad klistchko??? some of this hatton fans really can deal with reality.

So...no fighter with long arms can lose? You have totally missed my point and any logical boxing discussion appears to be out of the question.

If a fighter can get in close and work long arms dont matter. Theres really no need to go on a crazed rampage about "how dare someone suggest Williams fight Hatton" how about Williams vs Berto or Witter? maybe those would be allowed.

[Ray*]

So...no fighter with long arms can lose? You have totally missed my point and any logical boxing discussion appears to be out of the question.

If a fighter can get in close and work long arms dont matter. Theres really no need to go on a crazed rampage about "how dare someone suggest Williams fight Hatton" how about Williams vs Berto or Witter? maybe those would be allowed.

Nobody is suggesting a fighter with long arms cant lose but when you pit Williams and Hatton together you're talking about too many major disadvantages for Hatton, Anyone as small as Hatton has a very very slim chance including the short Berto.

We all know how hatton did in 2 fights at 147, So when we have a fighter who has even more advantages to add to that like williams theni would repeat it NO CHANCE.

[Ironside]

So...no fighter with long arms can lose? You have totally missed my point and any logical boxing discussion appears to be out of the question.

If a fighter can get in close and work long arms dont matter. Theres really no need to go on a crazed rampage about "how dare someone suggest Williams fight Hatton" how about Williams vs Berto or Witter? maybe those would be allowed.

That's true, but the reason I picked Williams to beat Ricky is, even though Williams has long arms, he is still very good on the inside, I don't think he would let Ricky capitalize like you say he would. Also, just the plain fact that he is naturally much bigger than Ricky, and obviously Ricky had a lot of disadvantages in WW as it was shown with Collazo and PBF.

[Mozza]

Yep...He got an hometown decision because he is the House fighter NOT collazo....Imagine if the fight was in Manchester and Collazo was the challenger like Hatton was, You lot would have been screaming blue moon murder if they give Collazo the decision.

No. If I thought Collazo won I would say so.