Shane Mosley Vs Ricky Hatton

**baya** · 02-07-2008, 03:18 PM

Originally posted by reedickyaluss

Who do you think would win? I dont think shane has the stamina at 36, going on 37 in september, to be able to handle the non stop pressure that floyd was able to handle from ricky...

Cotto has fought at 147:

Carlos Quintana - 23-0

Oktay Urkal - 38-3

Zab Judah - 34-4

Shane Mosley 44-4

Floyd Has Fought:

Sharmba Mitchell - 56-4

Zab Judah - 34-3

Carlos Baldomir - 43-9

Ricky Hatton - 43-0

Cottos best win was shane, and floyd best was Ricky

I think beating ricky hatton was the best win out of floyd and cotto AT welterweight...

Im saying AT Welterweight

I think Floyds resume at WW is better than cotto's with the ricky hatton win... regardless if ricky is better at 140.... floyd started out at SFW... and floyds the smallest WW out there...

7 pounds doesnt win a fight IMO

yes dude, it does.

there's no way that floyd's level of opposition at 147 is better than cotto's.

**GTL** · 02-07-2008, 03:18 PM

shane would tko hatton late or late ko with a right hand

**th4l3pr3ch4un** · 02-07-2008, 03:19 PM

i love ricky but i think it would be fairly similar to the mayweather fight... Shane is a bigger welterweight and would prolly catch him at some point in the later rounds.

**deevel79** · 02-07-2008, 03:19 PM

Hatton is unofficially 0-2 at 147. Many people believe Collazo got robbed. Given that, u think he beats Shane? Shane already whooped on Collazo might i add.

**THE REED** · 02-07-2008, 03:20 PM

Originally posted by baya

yes dude, it does.

there's no way that floyd's level of opposition at 147 is better than cotto's.

then why didnt oscar beat floyd? floyd moved up 7 pounds to fight him, just like ricky did?

**baya** · 02-07-2008, 03:22 PM

Originally posted by reedickyaluss

then why didnt oscar beat floyd? floyd moved up 7 pounds to fight him, just like ricky did?

that's a testament to how nasty certain fighters are, example, as you pointed out - floyd.

another example; morales moving up to fight david diaz and losing, you think david's really a better fighter than morales?

**deevel79** · 02-07-2008, 03:23 PM

Originally posted by reedickyaluss

Who do you think would win? I dont think shane has the stamina at 36, going on 37 in september, to be able to handle the non stop pressure that floyd was able to handle from ricky...

Cotto has fought at 147:

Carlos Quintana - 23-0

Oktay Urkal - 38-3

Zab Judah - 34-4

Shane Mosley 44-4

Floyd Has Fought:

Sharmba Mitchell - 56-4

Zab Judah - 34-3

Carlos Baldomir - 43-9

Ricky Hatton - 43-0

Cottos best win was shane, and floyd best was Ricky

I think beating ricky hatton was the best win out of floyd and cotto AT welterweight...

Im saying AT Welterweight

I think Floyds resume at WW is better than cotto's with the ricky hatton win... regardless if ricky is better at 140.... floyd started out at SFW... and floyds the smallest WW out there...

7 pounds doesnt win a fight IMO

If u think Hatton beats Shane at 147, u really are REE****YALUSS!

**THE REED** · 02-07-2008, 03:23 PM

Originally posted by baya

that's a testament to how nasty certain fighters are, example, as you pointed out - floyd.

another example; morales moving up to fight david diaz and losing, you think david's really a better fighter than morales?

prime for prime? absolutely not.... at this stage in Morales' career... YES

**baya** · 02-07-2008, 03:26 PM

Originally posted by reedickyaluss

prime for prime? absolutely not.... at this stage in Morales' career... YES

but you get what i'm saying, right? extra lbs definitely make all the difference in the world to certain fighters.

cotto looking normal his last year at 140 where he killed himself to make the weight, and then looking like a beast at 147; 7 pounds makes a huge difference.

Shane Mosley Vs Ricky Hatton