what fighter was robbed most by the judges?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxingwizard
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 4298
    • 126
    • 190
    • 12,228

    #51
    Originally posted by DWiens421
    I'll say it once, and I'll say it again. If Lederman doesn't have fighter A winning, fighter A cannot be robbed.

    Lederman settled on a draw for Trinidad-De La Hoya... not a robbery.
    And since when was Lederman actually right on a fight? According to punch stats De La Hoya out landed Trinidad by 137 punches. Also one of the judges gave the 12th round to De La Hoya when he didn't do a damn thing in the 12th round. I'm telling you Don King had something do with the outcome on that fight.

    Comment

    • Fox McCloud
      Mission Complete!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 18176
      • 789
      • 1,151
      • 26,037

      #52
      Originally posted by Dice
      Lederman, you talking about Harold "Jim I gotta Tell Ya" Lederman, lol, I agree wit his scorecards sometimes but I still thot De La Hoya was robbed. I cursed at the TV, I flipped a chair, then I relized De La Hoya made 50 billion dollars more then Trinidad and I got over it lol
      How can it be a robbery when a truly neutral party doesn't even endorse the person who you thought got robbed?

      Comment

      • Fox McCloud
        Mission Complete!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 18176
        • 789
        • 1,151
        • 26,037

        #53
        Originally posted by darkstar777
        And since when was Lederman actually right on a fight? According to punch stats De La Hoya out landed Trinidad by 137 punches. Also one of the judges gave the 12th round to De La Hoya when he didn't do a damn thing in the 12th round. I'm telling you Don King had something do with the outcome on that fight.
        All good and fine, but robbery means judges score it for a certain fighter on a pre-determined basis, meaning they have some incentive for doing so.

        What incentive would HBO's unoffical scorer have to "rob" Oscar with a draw?

        He may be an idiot, but he still judges on a neutral basis, which rule his cards out when it comes to robberies.

        Comment

        • Silencers
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 21957
          • 505
          • 235
          • 32,983

          #54
          Originally posted by darkstar777
          And since when was Lederman actually right on a fight? According to punch stats De La Hoya out landed Trinidad by 137 punches. Also one of the judges gave the 12th round to De La Hoya when he didn't do a damn thing in the 12th round. I'm telling you Don King had something do with the outcome on that fight.
          A judge doesn't score fights by punch stats, it's a round by round basis, I thought DLH won as well but him running for the last 3 rounds made it a close fight so I don't call it a robbery.

          Comment

          • Dice
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 3324
            • 86
            • 70
            • 9,833

            #55
            Lederman's card has nothing to do with anything. Its the actual judges scorecard. I simply call it a robbery because Everyone knows that Oscar won 75 to 80 percent of that fight in rounds.

            On a side note, anyone else find Lederman's voice hilarious

            Comment

            • Silencers
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 21957
              • 505
              • 235
              • 32,983

              #56
              Originally posted by Dice
              Lederman's card has nothing to do with anything. Its the actual judges scorecard. I simply call it a robbery because Everyone knows that Oscar won 75 to 80 percent of that fight in rounds.

              On a side note, anyone else find Lederman's voice hilarious
              Sounds like a cartoon character lol.

              Comment

              • Dice
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 3324
                • 86
                • 70
                • 9,833

                #57
                Originally posted by silencers98
                Sounds like a cartoon character lol.
                LMAO EXACTLY

                Comment

                • rudement
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 498
                  • 6
                  • 6
                  • 6,839

                  #58
                  did you mean burton vs ebo elder?
                  cause that was one of the most kick ass fights ive seen

                  Comment

                  • Lazy Liberal
                    Welfare Lifestyle!
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 3161
                    • 136
                    • 35
                    • 9,851

                    #59
                    Originally posted by darkstar777
                    And since when was Lederman actually right on a fight? According to punch stats De La Hoya out landed Trinidad by 137 punches. Also one of the judges gave the 12th round to De La Hoya when he didn't do a damn thing in the 12th round. I'm telling you Don King had something do with the outcome on that fight.
                    I still remember the reaction of all those who heard the decison when Tito won. Everyone said bull**** at the same time. When Tito won I told everyone to remember who his promoter was. Of course I can't prove it but I know some foul **** was involved. i know as oscar fan that he should not have run around like a preschool kid at recess for the last 3 rounds , but **** he won the fight. He also got ripped of against Mosley in the second fight . This was another one where even Oscar haters said BULL****. I'm not a loyal **** massager of Oscars I know that he lost against Felix Sturm and he got the decision.

                    Comment

                    • Fox McCloud
                      Mission Complete!
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 18176
                      • 789
                      • 1,151
                      • 26,037

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Dice
                      Lederman's card has nothing to do with anything. Its the actual judges scorecard. I simply call it a robbery because Everyone knows that Oscar won 75 to 80 percent of that fight in rounds.

                      On a side note, anyone else find Lederman's voice hilarious
                      Everyone except for Harold... who has been judging for 20+ years.

                      He is a better-trained judge than any of us on boxingscene...

                      He also is watching what the official judges are watching, from ringside, not from their living rooms.

                      So he has the same amount of training as the official judges, and he calls it a draw, meaning he didn't give De La Hoya the win. How is that a robbery?

                      What motive does Harold have to "rob" Oscar with his unofficial card? Not a single ****ing one.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP