Will Julie Lederman be judging Pavlik/Taylor II?

**FloydFanatic** · 01-30-2008, 06:23 PM

taylor was winning the fight until the knockout. word at camp is taylor is keeping it up longer now and is aware of it so well c what happens. taylor wins i think

**boxingknight** · 01-30-2008, 06:26 PM

taylors a moron, he has all the tools to beat a fighter like pavlik. But he'll fight Pavliks fight and lose again. I wanted Taylor to win the first fight but he disappointed me and let me down, so theres no way in hell I can favor him this time. I think Calzaghe would beat either of them. ****, Calzaghe fights in a higher weight class and throws a **** more punches then they do. You can call Calzaghes punches slaps, yet if there so slappy then why does his punches have enough power to have his opponents respect him? Kind of like floyd, ppl step in the ring with Calzaghe/Mayweather and they aren't exactly ko artists but they hit hard because if they didn't hit hard then there opponents wouldn't be backing the hell up away from them at times.

**Scott9945** · 01-30-2008, 06:29 PM

Originally posted by gavinz1970

I was looking at the judges scores for the first fight, and I could see how someone could have Taylor ahead on the cards, it was a close fight and Jermain had the advantage of the knockdown in rd 2. However, Julie Lederman scored O N E round leading up to the knockout for Kelly Pavlik. I have a sneaky feeling the rematch will go the distance, so before I put any points or money on Pavlik, I was wondering if she is judging. Because I don't believe it is possible for Kelly to win if she and one other judge like her is judging this fight, unless he knocks him out again.

If you think that's bad, ESPN's Dan Rafael scored every round for Taylor and said he was winning the fight easy. YIKES!

**The Next Champ** · 01-30-2008, 06:32 PM

Originally posted by gavinz1970

I was looking at the judges scores for the first fight, and I could see how someone could have Taylor ahead on the cards, it was a close fight and Jermain had the advantage of the knockdown in rd 2. However, Julie Lederman scored O N E round leading up to the knockout for Kelly Pavlik. I have a sneaky feeling the rematch will go the distance, so before I put any points or money on Pavlik, I was wondering if she is judging. Because I don't believe it is possible for Kelly to win if she and one other judge like her is judging this fight, unless he knocks him out again.

Ppll have to remember judges see a different fight from the one on tv....so maybe she saw taylor land harder shots or accurate punches

**Jim Jeffries** · 01-30-2008, 06:32 PM

Originally posted by FloydFanatic

taylor was winning the fight until the knockout. word at camp is taylor is keeping it up longer now and is aware of it so well c what happens. taylor wins i think

Fair enough, how many rounds did you give Pavlik though?

Originally posted by Scott9945

If you think that's bad, ESPN's Dan Rafael scored every round for Taylor and said he was winning the fight easy. YIKES!

Are you serious? And this guy makes a living scoring fights?

**Fox McCloud** · 01-30-2008, 06:33 PM

I'd **** Julie Lederman to be honest.

**FloydFanatic** · 01-30-2008, 06:34 PM

Originally posted by gavinz1970

Fair enough, how many rounds did you give Pavlik though?

i cant remember but pavlik was catching up i think.

**The Next Champ** · 01-30-2008, 06:34 PM

And also judges tend to give close rounds to the champ....wut does everyone say..u gotta go take the belt

**Jim Jeffries** · 01-30-2008, 06:38 PM

Originally posted by The Next Champ

And also judges tend to give close rounds to the champ....wut does everyone say..u gotta go take the belt

Okay fair enough, but against Castillo in the first fight, Castillo was the champ, yet the judges scored the fight 8 rds to Mayweather.

Will Julie Lederman be judging Pavlik/Taylor II?