Who wins and why?
Joe Calzaghe vs Chad Dawson
Collapse
-
Dawson with his better pure boxing ability, size advantage and power advantage. I see him out pointing Calzaghe in a chess match. -
-
Comment
-
So you think Mundine beats Calzaghe but Dawson doesn't? What do you base this on? Your nationality? I think you should stop complaining about other people being ignorant about Mundine if you are this unknowledgeable about Dawson.
Both Mundine and Dawson are quite unproven but both have trendemous potential.Comment
-
Comment
-
Man, you shouldn't have exposed yourself as a hypocrite just like that.
Overrated American? Lets see it against Johnson. Atleast Dawson seems willing to fight unlike a certain someone else.
Lets see Calzaghe and Dawson fight against the old men Bernard & Glen, then we will have a clearer point of view. Johnson will bring the pressure just like Calzaghe does. Lets see if Dawson will fold under it or not.Last edited by TheGreatA; 01-11-2008, 05:47 AM.Comment
-
i willl bet all of my points and probably keep giving points to you even after the fight is over, if Dawson losses. Thats how confident i am. Dawson TKO 7 Anthony Mundine
Comment
-
Expose myself? Dawsons a good fighter. But like any American fighter, he is slightly over rated. As happens when the biggest market for the sport is in the USA. e.g the indian cricket team is over rated by India. I see the same thing happening with Pavlik.
When Calzaghe wins nearly every round against Hopkins. Then a few of you may start to wonder. Maybe the best fighters are outside of the US. And yes partly to blame is everyone here, not even bothering to watch there fights. Just calling foreign fighters ****.
E.G Top contenders in super middleweight, beat both Pavlik and Taylor.Comment
Comment