How many fights should a Boxer have under his belt before going at real contenders?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2501
    upinurgirlsguts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20211
    • 902
    • 49
    • 28,237

    #1

    How many fights should a Boxer have under his belt before going at real contenders?

    The fact that Amir Kahn has been thinking about going at dudes like Katsidis and Diaz at this early stage of his career got me thinking. What do you all think he should be the experience level or amount of fights a prospect like Amir Kahn should have prior to facing off with world class fighters? In my opinion, 25 fights should be enough experience for someone to mature and gain an understanding of what could happen in the ring against world class opposition. Granted of course that the fighter hasnt fought ALL worthless bums. Thought maf****as?
    Last edited by 2501; 01-08-2008, 06:12 PM.
  • Ray  Ray
    HOLDIN IT DOWN`
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 7791
    • 451
    • 852
    • 20,693

    #2
    It all depends if they had amatuer experience or not

    With the amatuer experience IMO 15-20 pro fights
    Without it IMO 25-30 pro fights before challenging a world champ.

    Just my little 2 cents.

    Comment

    • W1LL
      Celtic Warrior
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2004
      • 11851
      • 845
      • 916
      • 71,119

      #3
      Man, you seriously believe that Frank Warren hype bull****?! Listen, you'll be lucky to even see Amir Khan fight a legitimate RING top 5 contender at his weight, even after he's bloated his record to around 40-0 fighting nobodies and champions of New Zealand and Guyana.

      Comment

      • 2501
        upinurgirlsguts
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 20211
        • 902
        • 49
        • 28,237

        #4
        Originally posted by Counterpunch
        Man, you seriously believe that Frank Warren hype bull****?! Listen, you'll be lucky to even see Amir Khan fight a legitimate RING top 5 contender at his weight, even after he's bloated his record to around 40-0 fighting nobodies and champions of New Zealand and Guyana.
        whether i believe it or not is not the subject at hand, just wondering what you guys thought should be the amount of bouts someone should have before challenging a legitimate contender. why do you want to hurt my feelings so bad? all i ever wanted was to hang out and play madden.

        Comment

        • Thread Stealer
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2007
          • 9657
          • 439
          • 102
          • 17,804

          #5
          it depends on the fighter. his amateur background, his speed of development, the opponent, etc...

          azumah nelson had a very good amateur career and gave salvador sanchez all he could handle after about 13 pro fights.

          floyd mayweather had a very good amateur background, and he beat the top 130 lb fighter after 17 pro fights.

          donald curry had an amazing amateur record, and he was fighting contenders pretty early on.

          other guys like salvador sanchez and j.c. chavez had less amateur background, and took more time getting their experience in the pro ranks.

          Comment

          • BennyST
            Shhhh...
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 9263
            • 1,036
            • 500
            • 21,301

            #6
            Originally posted by Thread Stealer
            it depends on the fighter. his amateur background, his speed of development, the opponent, etc...

            azumah nelson had a very good amateur career and gave salvador sanchez all he could handle after about 13 pro fights.

            floyd mayweather had a very good amateur background, and he beat the top 130 lb fighter after 17 pro fights.

            donald curry had an amazing amateur record, and he was fighting contenders pretty early on.

            other guys like salvador sanchez and j.c. chavez had less amateur background, and took more time getting their experience in the pro ranks.
            What about Jeff Fenech? He won his first title after only seven fights!!! He also won three titles in different weight divisions in only 20 fights!!! It was also against some very serious opposition. The guy was a freak.
            Last edited by BennyST; 01-09-2008, 12:27 AM.

            Comment

            • SkillspayBills
              Garlic Butter Gang!
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2007
              • 29181
              • 2,155
              • 3,739
              • 61,188

              #7
              Originally posted by Thread Stealer
              it depends on the fighter. his amateur background, his speed of development, the opponent, etc...

              azumah nelson had a very good amateur career and gave salvador sanchez all he could handle after about 13 pro fights.

              floyd mayweather had a very good amateur background, and he beat the top 130 lb fighter after 17 pro fights.

              donald curry had an amazing amateur record, and he was fighting contenders pretty early on.

              other guys like salvador sanchez and j.c. chavez had less amateur background, and took more time getting their experience in the pro ranks.
              Fully concur and you literally took my two examples (Mayweather and Azumah) right out off of my computer screen. It depends more on the fighter and his previous amateur experience. Personally some fighters, like Gamboa for example, could challenge any champion RIGHT NOW, it's all about who the fighter is.

              Comment

              • Left2body
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2006
                • 6200
                • 269
                • 277
                • 13,212

                #8
                Like others said it depends on the fighter and there amateur background.....but it also depends on the weight class they are fighting in. You'll often see the lighter weight guys have shots younger than the heavier guys do. This might have to do with the lighter weight guys aging quicker also (boxing age).

                You'll very very rarely see champions coming into form in there late 20's early 30's in the very low weights....by that time they're best boxing is behind them and even if there champs they are not as good as they use to be... but Heavy weights are just starting out at around 28.

                Comment

                • .::|ULTIMATE|::.
                  Gran Campeon
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 6222
                  • 443
                  • 474
                  • 13,409

                  #9
                  I think it depends on the fighter, some fighters have a long amateur experience while others do not. Others are downright natural fighters etc.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP