Tweet
Who was more complete boxer?
Who has best wins?
Who has better opponents?
Who has more better fights?
Who has best wins?
Who has better opponents?
Who has more better fights?
-
-
Morales was a more complete fighter -
Id go with Morales for the simple fact i dont see him ever getting beat the way Tito did against Winky, he made a former world champion look like he had never stepped foot in a boxing ring before.Comment
-
Who was more complete boxer?
Morales
Who has best wins?
Trinidad!! Destructions of Vargas, Joppy, Blocker...those were awesome wins!
Who has better opponents?
toss up here, quality of competition probably both get an 8 on a scale of 10.
Who has more better fights?
Morales in my estimation, vs Barrera WOW, I liked his fight vs Zaragoza too, awesome stuff from a youngster, and his first fight with Pacquiao...not that it was a big difference either way both of these guys did great stuff in the ring.Comment
-
I dont think this wis be better than:
MANY PACQUIAO Super champ
CARLOS FAMOSITO HERNANDEZ The real warrior
JUNIOR POISON JONES He beat twice Barrera
,MARCO A BARRERA A Legend... 3 wars
KEVIN KELLEY Big champion and possible HOF
IN JIN CHI 6 years like champion in featherweight WBC
PAUL AYALA 2 times Champion
GUTY ESPADAS JR Ex world champion
JESUS CHAVEZ 2 times champion in 2 divisionsComment
-
The only edge I would give Tito would be in the "boxing" category. Errything else is Morales.Comment
-
Morales was more of a complete boxer. But Tito fought better opponents by far. Tito fought guys that were undefeated..like Oba Carr and Campas..Oba had like 40 wins and 0 losses and Campas was like 50 wins and 0 losses. Not to mention the bigger names he fought which were all undefeated at the time Ried, Vargas, DLH. Morales was a technician and had excellent foot work and very good speed and power in his prime. Tito was as technically sound as Morales but he had great stamina and power.Comment
-
well morales is the better boxer..Comment
Comment