Tweet
Who was the better fighter Eubank or Benn ? i dont pay atention much to head to heads i look at the totallity of someones career rather than head to heads ,after all Benn won the 2nd fight IMO & would have gotten the decision if he had'nt had a point taken off i still had him winning regardless of the point deduction
-
23Benn was the better fighter30.43%7Eubank was the better fighter69.57%16 -
I think Eubank was the better fighter OverallComment
-
I think you know my answer to this one!Comment
-
Eubank was more technically sound than Benn. But as a power puncher it was Benn.Comment
-
Eubank was the better fighter as Benn had very little defensive skills BUT benn had more heart and hit harderComment
-
Eubank's power was underated he was KOing most of his opponents before the 2nd Michael Watson where he said he never wanted to win another fight by KO again. He won 6 of 24 of his fights after watson by KO. Eubank was the better fighter.Comment
-
I've always held these 2 fella's side by side.
Both warriors who did British Boxing proud and spoiled us with some Classic fights with each other and against others.
Sadly they both had the terrible experience of doing serious damage to two of their opponents.
In Eubanks case he was never the same again.
Both guys are equal in my eyes.
Thanks to both of them for the Entertainment.
Will we ever see 2 Warriors fighting at the same time again?
So far the answer is no.Comment
-
Eubank was two or three classes above Benn as far as boxing ability
But Benn was more naturally talented, had much better balance on the front foot, much more aggression, and generally more powerful hitsComment
Comment