Originally posted by wmute
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Cotto is Better than Floyd, Let's let Cotto walk in Floyd's footsteps..!!
Collapse
-
Cotto took on a legitimate ex-champion in Bazan only 14 fights into his career. Roughly one and a half years later he wins his first title, beating the living daylights out of Kelson Pinto. In between these points in time he beats eventual title holders in N'dou and Maussa.
Cotto then proceeds to make 6 defenses of his WBO title, beating some of the very best fighters the division CURRENTLY has to offer in Paul Malignaggi, Randall Bailey and Ricardo Torres.
Upon Cotto's move to his second weight class, he beats a top unbeaten prospect in Carlos Quintana for his second world title. It's not the linear title, but Cotto gets a piece of the pie. He then goes on to beat a world class European champion (Urkal), the former lineal Welterweight champion (Judah), and a faded Hall of Fame caliber fighter (Mosley).
As it stands, I believe Cotto's last 11 fights have been title fights. Only two of his opponents have survived the distance in that stretch. Roughly 35% of his career to date have been title fights. If we assume he continues to win or he continues to stay at this pace, by the time he matches Mayweather's record of 39 fights, 48% of his activity would be involved with title fights. Cotto has beaten 9 current or former champions to date as well if that does it for you.
He IS following in Floyd's foot steps. As boxing fans, we should want Floyd and Cotto to fight. There is nothing to be afraid of. If Cotto loses, all of his fans will live happy lives. If Floyd loses, nobody here is going to die...and if you lose sleep over it then you need to re-evaluate life in general.
These are the two best fighters in their division and they are both in their prime. If Cotto is BETTER than Floyd, he'd beat him in the ring when this fight is eventually (hopefully) made. If Floyd is better, he'll beat Cotto and leave no doubt that he is the better man.
Cotto won't prove anything with respect to Floyd by beating De La Hoya. He'll only prove that he's capable of beating Oscar on a given night. Floyd is a different animal. It'll take these two fighting each other to see who is the better guy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Horus View PostYou have proved nothing..!!
where is your proof..?
Originally posted by 2501Originally posted by Horus View PostExamples:
The point is that
Floyd win vs. ODLH was better than
Cotto win vs. Mosley
Floyd 30 years old vs. ODLH 34 years and he was the Jr. Middle Weight Champion
Cotto 27 years vs. Shane Mosley 36 years and just a WW Contender...
(You never address that point)
Originally posted by 2501I guess I already knew what to expect
Originally posted by 2501Originally posted by Horus View Post
So then you say some **** like…..
Titles dont mean **** to the casual fan and honestly - 2501
I response with:
Why fight for Belts then...?
Why does everybody want Floyd to unify the titles then if titles don’t meaned ****..?
Why is strict importance giving to defending your title..? (man..)
Originally posted by 2501Originally posted by Horus
what have I taken out of context these are your words….!!!
Originally posted by Horus
Because you expected Mayweather to win, therefore HIS WIN WASNT AS IMPRESSIVE...???
Wow....!!
In that case what would Floyd have to do to impress you...?
Because in any fight Floyd is in (at a reasonaBle weight) Floyd is going to be the favorite..
So using your logic Floyd can’t impress you no matter what he does because you know what to expect Floyd to do, and that is win....!!
It is good to know the truth finally comes out of you..!!!
Originally posted by HorusIt is good to know the truth finally comes out of you..!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by gerardofpr View PostI dont know about that. That 36 yr old never has been had Floyd fighting off of his back foot the first 5 rounds and even put him down.
What's worse? glove on the canvas while off balance or actually being hurt?
There is a reason why Mayweather is fighter of the year and Cotto is not
Comment
-
Originally posted by oldgringo View PostCotto took on a legitimate ex-champion in Bazan only 14 fights into his career. Roughly one and a half years later he wins his first title, beating the living daylights out of Kelson Pinto. In between these points in time he beats eventual title holders in N'dou and Maussa.
Cotto then proceeds to make 6 defenses of his WBO title, beating some of the very best fighters the division CURRENTLY has to offer in Paul Malignaggi, Randall Bailey and Ricardo Torres.
Upon Cotto's move to his second weight class, he beats a top unbeaten prospect in Carlos Quintana for his second world title. It's not the linear title, but Cotto gets a piece of the pie. He then goes on to beat a world class European champion (Urkal), the former lineal Welterweight champion (Judah), and a faded Hall of Fame caliber fighter (Mosley).
As it stands, I believe Cotto's last 11 fights have been title fights. Only two of his opponents have survived the distance in that stretch. Roughly 35% of his career to date have been title fights. If we assume he continues to win or he continues to stay at this pace, by the time he matches Mayweather's record of 39 fights, 48% of his activity would be involved with title fights. Cotto has beaten 9 current or former champions to date as well if that does it for you.
He IS following in Floyd's foot steps. As boxing fans, we should want Floyd and Cotto to fight. There is nothing to be afraid of. If Cotto loses, all of his fans will live happy lives. If Floyd loses, nobody here is going to die...and if you lose sleep over it then you need to re-evaluate life in general.
These are the two best fighters in their division and they are both in their prime. If Cotto is BETTER than Floyd, he'd beat him in the ring when this fight is eventually (hopefully) made. If Floyd is better, he'll beat Cotto and leave no doubt that he is the better man.
Cotto won't prove anything with respect to Floyd by beating De La Hoya. He'll only prove that he's capable of beating Oscar on a given night. Floyd is a different animal. It'll take these two fighting each other to see who is the better guy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by oldgringo View PostCotto took on a legitimate ex-champion in Bazan only 14 fights into his career. Roughly one and a half years later he wins his first title, beating the living daylights out of Kelson Pinto. In between these points in time he beats eventual title holders in N'dou and Maussa.
Cotto then proceeds to make 6 defenses of his WBO title, beating some of the very best fighters the division CURRENTLY has to offer in Paul Malignaggi, Randall Bailey and Ricardo Torres.
Upon Cotto's move to his second weight class, he beats a top unbeaten prospect in Carlos Quintana for his second world title. It's not the linear title, but Cotto gets a piece of the pie. He then goes on to beat a world class European champion (Urkal), the former lineal Welterweight champion (Judah), and a faded Hall of Fame caliber fighter (Mosley).
As it stands, I believe Cotto's last 11 fights have been title fights. Only two of his opponents have survived the distance in that stretch. Roughly 35% of his career to date have been title fights. If we assume he continues to win or he continues to stay at this pace, by the time he matches Mayweather's record of 39 fights, 48% of his activity would be involved with title fights. Cotto has beaten 9 current or former champions to date as well if that does it for you.
He IS following in Floyd's foot steps. As boxing fans, we should want Floyd and Cotto to fight. There is nothing to be afraid of. If Cotto loses, all of his fans will live happy lives. If Floyd loses, nobody here is going to die...and if you lose sleep over it then you need to re-evaluate life in general.
These are the two best fighters in their division and they are both in their prime. If Cotto is BETTER than Floyd, he'd beat him in the ring when this fight is eventually (hopefully) made. If Floyd is better, he'll beat Cotto and leave no doubt that he is the better man.
Cotto won't prove anything with respect to Floyd by beating De La Hoya. He'll only prove that he's capable of beating Oscar on a given night. Floyd is a different animal. It'll take these two fighting each other to see who is the better guy.
I want to point out how Cotto beating Oscar will prove something with respect to Floyd, something very important and beloved to Floyd... $$$
And with this one I am really going to bed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wmute View PostAhem, what was Cotto doing after the 36 year old hurt him? oh he was defensive for 3 rounds.
What's worse? glove on the canvas while off balance or actually being hurt?
There is a reason why Mayweather is fighter of the year and Cotto is not
And yes, there is a reason why PBF is fighter of the year, but that's not it.
Comment
-
you have not proved anything...!! your whole post was nonsense
Obviously, I'm letting it be known that I knew it wouldnt be a competitive fight because Floyd is in his prime and Oscar wasnt- 2501
they are 4 years apart..
oscar had all the advanages
oscar pick the judges
the ref
the ring
the gloves
the location
the weight
and oscar is world class fighter with a Title at the time of the fight...!!!
come on now...!!
I can site at least 20 more example why you should be impress get out of here with that...!!!
you saying owned but nobody agrees with you...lol
ok 2501 accept that you belong to me..!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by wmute View PostNice one, OG!
I want to point out how Cotto beating Oscar will prove something with respect to Floyd, something very important and beloved to Floyd... $$$
And with this one I am really going to bed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gerardofpr View PostMaybe if Cotto would've fought off of his back foot he would've never gotten hurt? Definitely glove on the canvas, that's called a knock down buddy, don't recall seeing PBF touch the canvas before, somehow that old never has been managed to do it.
And yes, there is a reason why PBF is fighter of the year, but that's not it.
Comment
Comment