BoxRec?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KESSLER
    GOONER FOR LIFE
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 15487
    • 782
    • 716
    • 24,000

    #1

    BoxRec?

    Is that site run by fools? For real, they've got Bernard Hopkins as P4P #1?...
    And Mayweather #2

    I know their sites P4P list ain't nothing official and nothing to worry about, but damn. How can anyone rank Hopkins above MAYWEATHER on the P4P? I like Hopkins, no question about that. But still .. Oh and they've got Pacman as #6, I don't like him though .. But I know that he should be atleast 2 or 3.
    These ****ers are good if you wanna check up some records and that's it .

    Should be:
    1. Mayweather
    2. Calzaghe
    3. Pacquiao

    Oh, and I had nothing to do .. So I just started posting a thread about how it annoyed me haha.
  • THe TRiNiTY
    Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 10079
    • 405
    • 103
    • 17,986

    #2
    Bernard at 1 is crazy. If he beats Calzaghe, he's at number 2 or 3. But at this point. Top 5 or even 6, is realistic... At best. Mayweather SHOULD be number one.

    Comment

    • Guest
      • 0
      • 0
      • 0

      #3
      Boxrec rankings are a computer program, so there isn't any live person compiling them, the program just awards points for certain things.

      That's why you'll see someone washed up in the top 20, or someone who had one good win and a bunch of ko's overrated.

      The Boxing Encyclopedia is pretty good too.

      JReckoning

      Comment

      • Scott9945
        Gonna be more su****ious
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 22032
        • 741
        • 1,371
        • 30,075

        #4
        The only thing worse than Box-rec's ratings is their fictitious fight schedule.

        Comment

        • revs1227
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 8040
          • 255
          • 279
          • 15,341

          #5
          lmao at b hop at #1
          it should be
          floyd
          calz
          pacman deffff

          hopkins maybe 7 or 8 ..just becuz teh winky win ..if thats what u wanna call it

          Comment

          • KESSLER
            GOONER FOR LIFE
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2007
            • 15487
            • 782
            • 716
            • 24,000

            #6
            Originally posted by revs1227
            lmao at b hop at #1
            it should be
            floyd
            calz
            pacman deffff

            hopkins maybe 7 or 8 ..just becuz teh winky win ..if thats what u wanna call it
            I'd call it a boring hugfest

            Comment

            • Haterfree
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 2039
              • 105
              • 0
              • 8,299

              #7
              Boxrec is good for looking up a fighter or a fighters record. Thats it. The biggest hater & idiot combined has to admit Floyd is better P4P than B Hop.

              Comment

              • -EX-
                Trading Block Tycoon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 21258
                • 720
                • 689
                • 32,678

                #8
                If you base it off of just resume Bernard could be number 1.
                But as of right now it should be Floyd then Pacquiao. I'd put Hopkins third but Calzaghe's people would disagree wit me.

                Comment

                • Dick-Sucker
                  **** Thug
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 3305
                  • 264
                  • 167
                  • 6,605

                  #9
                  There taking the piss. Surely.

                  Comment

                  • Bhopreign
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 11273
                    • 419
                    • 100
                    • 12,036

                    #10
                    Sorry Cal shouldnt even be considered number 2. Why because he beat Kessler, who was a good supermiddle but hadnt beaten a name himself? Cal still after all these years hasnt really beaten a great fighter. Cal point blank shouldnt be at two, it should be Pacquiao.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP