Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ring Editor Predicts Pacquiao Over Marquez

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Pacquaio is only rated #2 P4P because he knocks people out, nothing to do with Mayweather who is the actual #1 P4P. It's a really biased system of ranking them because if it was based on skill instead of who gives people the fights they want to see then Pac would be like #10 on the list. JMM has far superior boxing skills to Pac. The only reason he's been getting hit lately is because he wanted a big money fight, look at his early fights and he hardly ever got hit but people considered him boring so he actually mixes it up now. I see him playing it safe and beating Pacquiao by pure skill.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by xcaret View Post
      wtf are you smoking on? JMM is far more superior then one-dimensional Pacquiao...

      JMM will win this fight, less trouble then the barrera fight.

      Just like Morales and Barerra....but they got KOed. 1 dimension is all it takes to retire legends. If Pacquiao had not arrived, Barrera and Morales would still be fighting a lot of opponents. Just look at the oldest of them all..JMM. But after March 15...same thing will happen to JMM.....1 more fight then retire.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by uclanemesis View Post
        Pacquaio is only rated #2 P4P because he knocks people out, nothing to do with Mayweather who is the actual #1 P4P. It's a really biased system of ranking them because if it was based on skill instead of who gives people the fights they want to see then Pac would be like #10 on the list. JMM has far superior boxing skills to Pac. The only reason he's been getting hit lately is because he wanted a big money fight, look at his early fights and he hardly ever got hit but people considered him boring so he actually mixes it up now. I see him playing it safe and beating Pacquiao by pure skill.
        listen i like jmm, and manny! they are great, but for u to sit there and say that manny is way less skilled than jmm ur nuts. more skilled than manny? yeah i think so. but the guy is p4p #2 for a reason, and the way you talk about manny being far inferior to jmm is laughable. u act like he should not even be in the same ring with jmm. if thats the case than why did jmm lose to manny the first time????????????................. i'll wait! talk all you want, but the sad fact is that ur wrong, and manny is way better than u give him credit for.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Melly-Mel View Post
          listen i like jmm, and manny! they are great, but for u to sit there and say that manny is way less skilled than jmm ur nuts. more skilled than manny? yeah i think so. but the guy is p4p #2 for a reason, and the way you talk about manny being far inferior to jmm is laughable. u act like he should not even be in the same ring with jmm. if thats the case than why did jmm lose to manny the first time????????????................. i'll wait! talk all you want, but the sad fact is that ur wrong, and manny is way better than u give him credit for.
          obviously your ***ing blind as stevie wonder....how the **** is manny more skilled then JMM? does his repeated same combo left right left right better then JMM's counter punches?

          Just cause manny is rated #2 in the p4p list doesnt mean hes a better boxer then everybody below him... hes up there for beating barrera and morales...

          When the **** did Manny beat JMM? again, your ***ing ******! I only give credit when its due, manny HAS NO SKILLS.. hes one-dimensional...

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by xcaret View Post
            obviously your ***ing blind as stevie wonder....how the **** is manny more skilled then JMM? does his repeated same combo left right left right better then JMM's counter punches?

            Just cause manny is rated #2 in the p4p list doesnt mean hes a better boxer then everybody below him... hes up there for beating barrera and morales...

            When the **** did Manny beat JMM? again, your ***ing ******! I only give credit when its due, manny HAS NO SKILLS.. hes one-dimensional...
            U said JMM will have less trouble with Pac compared to MAB. An old MAB knockdown JMM while Pac knockdown JMM 3x. JMM has the superior boxing skills but Pac, even though still one dimensional, has improved and still working on his skills. Even MAB said Pac had a good defense on their rematch. MAB is older, slower, and have been into many wars while Pac has speed, power, and still in his prime. And why is JMM up in the P4P, first it was a draw with Pac then for beating an old war torn MAB.

            If Pac beats JMM, you still would not give credit to Pac. You don't even give credit to other fighters who are not Mexicans.
            Last edited by loui_ludwig; 12-22-2007, 10:28 AM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Marquez wins by decision. And its funny to hear that skill wise manny is on the same level as Marquez.

              All Pacquiao fans always forget that Morales kicked Pacquiaos ass in the first fight.

              And Pacquiao didn't fight Soto or Guzman, were still waiting for Pacquiao to fight a prime fighter at 130. And Soto v. Guzman was a very close fight that could have gone either way.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by ferocity View Post
                Marquez wins by decision. And its funny to hear that skill wise manny is on the same level as Marquez.

                All Pacquiao fans always forget that Morales kicked Pacquiaos ass in the first fight.

                And Pacquiao didn't fight Soto or Guzman, were still waiting for Pacquiao to fight a prime fighter at 130. And Soto v. Guzman was a very close fight that could have gone either way.
                1st fight was forgotten because pac has made the adjustment... maybe yo ought to see pac-em 2nd and 3rd fight. so you will know, after that trilogy -- pac came out a different figther.

                Whose Guzman, Soto, and Valero... pac dont need them, instead they need pac -- they should step up their competition to be worthy of him.

                If you're the top dog in the division, its you who waits... let those names prove their worth. Only then pac fights them

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View Post
                  To be honest I feel sorry for the Mexicans if Marquez will get whooped.. You know Barrera and Morales are the only mexicans that can generate crowd in Vegas.. It's sad... I hope he fights american or british in his next fight.. I don't want to see mexican fighters repeatedly getting their @ss kick by 1 man.
                  You...Can't be serious.

                  lmao You only got one fighter left, if Paq loses, and losses convincingly, Flips will have absolutely nothing left. Mexican's will always be on the scene, but your best have gotten smashed, specifically gotten smashed and taken off the scene by Mexican fighters. (lol Wich I think is fitting, being that you're people and handlers are blatantly trying to make a name off of us)

                  But if Paq losses, thats it. And you feel sorry for us? lol Kiddo, we'll be alright, maybe you should focus your sympathy's toward your own? lol I'm just saying, being that things aren't exactly turning out the way you all thought..just saying

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by xcaret View Post
                    obviously your ***ing blind as stevie wonder....how the **** is manny more skilled then JMM? does his repeated same combo left right left right better then JMM's counter punches?

                    Just cause manny is rated #2 in the p4p list doesnt mean hes a better boxer then everybody below him... hes up there for beating barrera and morales...

                    When the **** did Manny beat JMM? again, your ***ing ******! I only give credit when its due, manny HAS NO SKILLS.. hes one-dimensional...
                    if i am blind than you are illeterate you dumb *****. i said in all my posts that jmm is more skilled than manny, but not by the huge ammount your claiming crack baby! you said jmm is far superior to manny which i said he is not. manny is a notch below jmm, but thats it. fyi, manny won the first fight! so wtf are you talking about? close fight 4 sure, that shows they are close in skill as well otherwise it would have been a blow out. and like it or agree with the decision manny won so how does that translateinto jmm being far superior to manny? i'll wait!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! go find something else to run your mouth about boy, your making your own **** up, and have a clouded view of what u want to see! ah, i am done with you. pac already beat the dude, and you wont even acknowledge it so your abviously a hater, and not a true fan who is trying to dissect the fight, and admit they are both great, and the skill set is while not the same, close enough to produce another great fight!
                    Last edited by MELLY-MEL...; 12-22-2007, 09:17 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by xcaret View Post
                      obviously your ***ing blind as stevie wonder....how the **** is manny more skilled then JMM? does his repeated same combo left right left right better then JMM's counter punches?

                      Just cause manny is rated #2 in the p4p list doesnt mean hes a better boxer then everybody below him... hes up there for beating barrera and morales...

                      When the **** did Manny beat JMM? again, your ***ing ******! I only give credit when its due, manny HAS NO SKILLS.. hes one-dimensional...
                      Originally posted by Melly-Mel View Post
                      listen i like jmm, and manny! they are great, but for u to sit there and say that manny is way less skilled than jmm ur nuts. more skilled than manny? yeah i think so. but the guy is p4p #2 for a reason, and the way you talk about manny being far inferior to jmm is laughable. u act like he should not even be in the same ring with jmm. if thats the case than why did jmm lose to manny the first time????????????................. i'll wait! talk all you want, but the sad fact is that ur wrong, and manny is way better than u give him credit for.
                      Originally posted by Melly-Mel View Post
                      manny is rated p4p number 2, but jmm is way more skilled, and far superior??????? gimme a break, what r u somking cracky? i feel jmm is better, but not by that much. if jmm was that much more skilled that he would have knocked out or badly outpointed manny! it was a very good fight, and save the kd's jmm would have won, by 4-6 rds! the fact is it is a great matchup, and jmm should take it by 4 or so rds, but if u count manny out thats foolish. agai, wtf are u smoking? p4p #2 = one dimensional? ok, sure pal. act like all those posts u made are at least somewhat knowledgeable because this post is doing you absolutely no justice! u r owning your self! on the other hand your right on par as to what i would expect from a marg hugger!
                      ok ****head here you go. again show me where i said manny was superior to jmm??????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? **** out of here *****!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP