Tweet
Boxing is getting pretty sorry now days with so many belts and champs. How the hell will we ever really know who the best fighter in each division is? Especially now, fighters ducking other top ranked fighters because the money isn't good enough? Thats b.s., they need to stop being ******* and have the best fight the best and winner takes all. They should also consider having the winner of a fight make just an example; $1o million and loser makes $5million. this way both fighters fight their hearts out and we don't get crap like winky wright, A. tarver, or Chris Bird, etc., etc., etc. Boxing needs to boost up the game man, the u.f.c. fans are talking so much **** and for good reason perhaps?
-
-
I don't mind more then one belt, but the Alphabet soup rankings really need to their **** together. If they had good rankings, I wouldn't care. -
Well it's long been a dream of mine if I became a billionaire to takeover all the different sanctioning bodies and form one boxing federation with one world title belt in each division. Then i'd turn Oscar de la hoya and some serious dough promoting the resulting superfights.Comment
-
boxing should have only one champ per division, but there is too much money in sanctioning (extortion/bribery) fees and stuff like that.
boxing's always had this sort of alphabet soup. even in the old days, only it was to a lesser extent.Comment
-
The main thing about the belts I dislike is champs having to fight meaningless challengers like the ****er who just beat Frederick Klose. Their politics are bull**** as well.Comment
Comment