What controversy? Yeah it was close, but it was clear who the winner was. Not even Mosley questioned the decision. He excepted the defeat, and gave his props to Cotto. If Shane aint crying for a rematch, then why are u?
exactley..TO CALL COTTO/ MOSLEY A CONTROVERSY is stoopid. it was a UD victory, not a SD like the Oscar/ floyd fight...
The top welters don't really want to fight him. It is VERY EASY to talk behind a mic, but under those lights, its a WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY! I think a Testimony from Hatton will wake these "top welters" out of la-la land!!!
Mayweather ain't no walk in the park like the "MAY-HATERS" movement make him seem!
The top welters don't really want to fight him. It is VERY EASY to talk behind a mic, but under those lights, its a WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY! I think a Testimony from Hatton will wake these "top welters" out of la-la land!!!
Mayweather ain't no walk in the park like the "MAY-HATERS" movement make him seem!
Hey, Floyd . I like this May-hates THING You just came up with, pretty cool.
What controversy? Yeah it was close, but it was clear who the winner was. Not even Mosley questioned the decision. He excepted the defeat, and gave his props to Cotto. If Shane aint crying for a rematch, then why are u?
Who's crying? I said there was controversy surrounding that fingt and there was. Shane even felt as though the crowd may have swayed the Judges opinions. Like I said, if Cotto wants to take away all of that then he should give Shane a rematch.
I'll save it under my fav. on my computer. I dont have any room to put it in my sig.
I got you though. I will save it.
cool, but im tellin ya, I mean that. I am not fake or a hater. maRGARITO is my fav fighter, if I were hating i would be saying Floyd needs to fight him. Marg LOST and isnt in a position to call out anyone. He needs to rematch Clottey or call out Cintron , he atleast has that right...
Who's crying? I said there was controversy surrounding that fingt and there was. Shane even felt as though the crowd may have swayed the Judges opinions. Like I said, if Cotto wants to take away all of that then he should give Shane a rematch.
theres' no controversy guy get some special glasses.
Who's crying? I said there was controversy surrounding that fingt and there was. Shane even felt as though the crowd may have swayed the Judges opinions. Like I said, if Cotto wants to take away all of that then he should give Shane a rematch.
Who's crying? I said there was controversy surrounding that fingt and there was. Shane even felt as though the crowd may have swayed the Judges opinions. Like I said, if Cotto wants to take away all of that then he should give Shane a rematch.
I never heard Shane complain not once about the decision. Plus, what would a rematch prove? Once Cotto beats him again, guys like you will only claim that Cotto beat an "old" Shane. So what's the point?
Comment