If the ring was 4ft smaller and ref let Ricky fight

**Tyson2k7** · 12-09-2007, 02:04 AM

Yeah lets just cut the ring in half while where at it?

hahahaha

**The Weebler** · 12-09-2007, 02:04 AM

Originally posted by Tyson2k7

Yeah lets just cut the ring in half while where at it?

hahahaha

why take the extra 4ft all round? and that ref was poor.

**KESSLER** · 12-09-2007, 02:05 AM

you'd get the same result as tonight, that mother****er aint on money mays level .. nobody out there is

**HeavyHitter** · 12-09-2007, 02:05 AM

Cmon no excuses, he got handled by the better Boxer. Keep it real!

**nmuburner22** · 12-09-2007, 02:05 AM

Originally posted by The Weebler

Still backing Floyd?

I wouldn't. Ricky would've cornered him.

Your pathetic..you went from respectable poster to a troll in a matter of hours....

Cong**** man.

**Shanus** · 12-09-2007, 02:06 AM

Hatton would have done alot better if the ref had let em fight but the outcome wouldn't have been any different, Floyd was the better fighter tonight.

**W1LL** · 12-09-2007, 02:06 AM

Why not just make it fair and tie Floyds arms behind his back?

**SkillspayBills** · 12-09-2007, 02:06 AM

Floyd was beating Ricky on the outside AND the inside, you see the difference there. NO EXCUSES. Ay Dios, pull up that thread man.

**The Weebler** · 12-09-2007, 02:06 AM

Originally posted by HeavyHitter

Cmon no excuses, he got handled by the better Boxer. Keep it real!

Those variables were pretty fckin important. The ref stood in and protected Floyd all night and that extra space he had was key to his gameplan.

If the ring was 4ft smaller and ref let Ricky fight