Mayweather Has Not Ducked Anyone

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2501
    upinurgirlsguts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20211
    • 902
    • 49
    • 28,237

    #11
    the fact that this is an ongoing "debate" regarding Mayweather says alot.

    Comment

    • ThaHorseman
      Undisputed Champion
      • Sep 2006
      • 1472
      • 141
      • 19
      • 7,875

      #12
      Originally posted by Sin City
      Erick Morales, Marco Barrera, Manny P there are many he ducked @ 130 and 135. LOL @ thread starter.
      This is why nobody can or should respect anything you say.

      Comment

      • Jim Jeffries
        rugged individualist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 20740
        • 1,376
        • 2,868
        • 54,838

        #13
        Originally posted by Parody
        That version of DLH would have beaten most fighters 147-154
        Most fighters sure, most top 10 fighters in either of those divisions, I don't think so.

        Originally posted by warp1432
        Ignore Satori, he's an idiot.

        Though, De La Hoya was still good. Out of his prime? Yes. Good? Yes.
        Well yes he was good, but much too inactive and much slower than he was in his prime to be effective. Not to mention he lacked the stamina to be any good past the 6th round.

        Comment

        • deliveryman
          Your token white guy
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 7592
          • 362
          • 178
          • 15,510

          #14
          Originally posted by gavinz1970
          If a 34 year old loser of 2 of his last 4 fights, and with only one fight in almost 3 years is the most dangerous opponent of his career, then Mayweather's legacy is in serious trouble.
          Losses to a much bigger Hopkins, and Shane Mosely in a fight where a lot of people felt Oscar deserved the victory. Two pretty good opponents if you ask me. Oscar was also coming off a sensational proformance against Ricardo Mayorga.

          Floyd fought Oscar at 154, while weighing 148 on fight night compared to Oscar weighing 160+. It was also his first fight at 154, and his 5th weight class in 9 years. Not to mention giving up every single advantage possible, from ring size, to gloves, to location, etc. Sorry bud, that's impressive anyway you slice it.
          Last edited by deliveryman; 12-02-2007, 11:02 PM.

          Comment

          • warp1432
            the mailman
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 14406
            • 478
            • 347
            • 24,060

            #15
            Originally posted by gavinz1970
            Most fighters sure, most top 10 fighters in either of those divisions, I don't think so.



            Well yes he was good, but much too inactive and much slower than he was in his prime to be effective. Not to mention he lacked the stamina to be any good past the 6th round.
            That's funny considering De La Hoya banked rounds 6,7, and 8.He faded after that, imo.

            That and I think he could still beat most fighters at 154 except Spinks (he'd get to tired chasing him around) and possibly Forrest. Maybe even Karminazan could too, but I doubt it.

            Comment

            • -EX-
              Trading Block Tycoon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2006
              • 21258
              • 720
              • 689
              • 32,678

              #16
              At the time I considered Corrales a bigger threat against Floyd. Corrales was bigger and stronger and was undefeated. All the people who say Floyd ducked certain people like Morales, Barrera,etc. pull names out of a hat. Floyd wasn't in the same weightclass with these guys years back. Floyd wasn't a household name either. His first big PPV was in 05.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP