David Haye vs Bernard Hopkins @ cruiserweight

**Warrior Rage** · 12-02-2007, 08:40 AM

That's a tough one. I'll come back to this.

**Dynamite Kid** · 12-02-2007, 09:08 AM

i think Haye is to raw technically & inexperienced to win this fight ,Hopkins would pick holes in that leaky defence of his even at his age

Hopkins is to smart for Haye & Haye is to wild & takes to many chances he would'nt beat a surgeon like Hopkins not IMO ,u might think Haye could outwork bhop but Haye has'nt showed the capacity to be able to set a pace and sustain it in any of his fights not to my knowledge anyway

**majestiC** · 12-02-2007, 09:14 AM

Hopkins is far to small, Haye hits harder than proberbly than anyone p4p I can only see a KO victory for Haye even tho Haye can't make Cruiser anymore.

**Dynamite Kid** · 12-02-2007, 09:21 AM

Originally posted by majestic

Hopkins is far to small, Haye hits harder than proberbly than anyone p4p I can only see a KO victory for Haye even tho Haye can't make Cruiser anymore.

Haye would'nt KO Hopkins ,he would be lead down the path by Hopkins into the latter part of the fight made to make all the running in the early rounds use a lot of energy trying to engage & hit Hopkins while getting clipped with Counters occasionally then towards the end of the fight bhop would take a tired Haye to school IMO

BHOP has to many ring smarts for Haye

**MickyHatton** · 12-02-2007, 09:23 AM

Technically Hopkins is far superior but Haye would be way too strong.

Eventually he will land and that will end the fight, we are talking about a true Heavyweight with fast hands here not a blown up middle.

**Sugar_ITA** · 12-02-2007, 09:24 AM

Hopkins is a natural middleweight. Evene now (@ 175) you can see how he's "small". Haye via TKO, he's too much heavy.

**Dynamite Kid** · 12-02-2007, 09:28 AM

Originally posted by Micky Hatton

Technically Hopkins is far superior but Haye would be way too strong.

Eventually he will land and that will end the fight, we are talking about a true Heavyweight with fast hands here not a blown up middle.

Hopkins has never been stopped ,James Toney was a natural middleweight & he has been campaigning at Heavyweight for how many years without showing signs of a questionable chin ,hell Toney has been shown to have a better chin than some natural Heavyweights lmao

trust me Haye dont fight intelligently enough for to beat Hopkins power alone would not get the job done against Hopkins

**WLAD OWNS** · 12-02-2007, 09:32 AM

I don't like David Haye at all because he is being overhyped and overrated by his fellow Limey nuthuggers, but I think the bigger natural CW/HW Haye would obviously beat the smaller natural MW/LHW Hopkins. This is a ****** thread.

**Dynamite Kid** · 12-02-2007, 09:39 AM

Originally posted by WLAD OWNS

I don't like David Haye at all because he is being overhyped and overrated by his fellow Limey nuthuggers, but I think the bigger natural CW/HW Haye would obviously beat the smaller natural MW/LHW Hopkins. This is a ****** thread, I don't even know why I am replying.

cause u are ****** lmfao

David Haye vs Bernard Hopkins @ cruiserweight