I already responded to that... RodBarker's posts rarely deserve any thoughtful response. He's all bark and no bite.
Actually he makes alot of sense. What you're saying is that it's all up to Hatton what happens in this fight. Whatever Mayweather does makes no difference. If Hatton wins it's because he was as good as for the Tszyu fight but if Floyd owned Hatton then it's because Hatton wasn't at his best (yea right).
Actually he makes alot of sense. What you're saying is that it's all up to Hatton what happens in this fight. Whatever Mayweather does makes no difference. If Hatton wins it's because he was as good as for the Tszyu fight but if Floyd owned Hatton then it's because Hatton wasn't at his best (yea right).
That's a set up excuse.
I thought I already explained what I meant. Did you read my response? Or, do you want me to state it again? In the case of the latter, then I will say go back and read it yourself.
I thought I already explained what I meant. Did you read my response? Or, do you want me to state it again? In the case of the latter, then I will say go back and read it yourself.
Not worth is. I could care less. I just wanted you to acknowlege that you're unknowingly (perhaps) making excuses.
Didnt tyson paid off lewis like 2 millions dollars to step aside?
Yes but that was too fight Seldon i think it was which was around 1996.
Lewis had some what of a slow start to his career and wasn't on anyones radar during Tyson's prime 80's-91.
Comment