Tweet
I don’t know. I am not sure if it is such a great match up for wlad. Ali had much better hand speed and would be able to counter wlad quite easy, Ali was also a master at judging distance and with his excellent footwork would be able to make wlad miss and then come in with his own punches. Wlad also doesnt have much head or body movement he could well take a lot of punishment from ali. Another problem for wlad is he would be facing someone with a much better faster jab if ali beats wlad to the jab what can wlad do all his work evolves around the jab. wlad has a punchers chance that’s for sure but i am sure that ali would find a way to win. that’s my opinion but i could be wrong we will never know.
-
-
i think out of the top heavyweight's of the 70's norton would be the fight that wlad has the best chance in.Comment
-
Ali, is the better fighter, but at the time, most heavyweights weren't as big as wlad. Ken norton is a good fighter, but if he could beat ali, wlad has got a chanceComment
-
If Wlad has a chance of beating Ali, so does Holyfield then, so does Rid**** Bowe, and so does Vitali, and so does Michael Moore, and so does Oliver MCcall since he knocked out Lewis, and so does..and so does. and so.. and ..Comment
-
wlad is a much better boxer/puncher than mcall and moorer. mcall got lucky catching lewis walking into a shot. holyfield lacked the reach to deal with ali as did moorer. prime bowe would have been competive with him as would have vitali. beating him is a different story. ali always rose to the occasion against dangerous punchers but he did struggle with a lot of guys and did get couple questionable decisions so its not like he was unbeatableLast edited by beez721; 11-30-2007, 06:37 AM.Comment
-
There has'nt been a Heavyweight Champion who had as much courage & Heart as Muhammad Ali something that gets overlooked when talking about Ali IMO
he had Heart for days & could fight for 15 rounds at a hard pace in a tough fight ,Comment
Comment