Barrera Vs. Morales VS Vasquez Vs. Marquez(based on first two fights)

[Kc-hoodsta]

which do u htink was a better saga beased of the first two fights?

[-Antonio-]

Probably Vasquez/Marquez. The third MAB/Morales fight was almost as good as the first though.

[El Termible]

Bar-Mor 1 was better than Mar-Vaz 1, but Mar-Vaz 2 was better than Bar-Mor 2. So the third fight is gonna decide it.

[Kc-hoodsta]

uppin people

[Kball15]

I like the action in the Vazquez-Marquez fights a lot better.

More flush shots, more blood, equal passion. Both define what boxing is all about, but i think the Morales-Barrera fights, especially the first one, are overrated

[2501]

but i think the Morales-Barrera fights, especially the first one, are overrated

[ElGranLuchador]

vasquez marquez for me it just cuz of the knockouts

[moy22487]

the fact that morales barrera was a bettle of attrition and againts each other was great

[bishop2006]

Right now,id say Marquez-Vasquez
Barrera-Morales II wasnt better then Marquez-Vasquez I or II

Marquez-Vasquez II was a GREAT fight,both of there faces where ripped open,and they traded brutal shots,very brutal shots,and while all this was going on u could see so much skill in the ring,it was amazing,it for me,was on the same level as Barrera-Morales I,but not better because it didnt last longer

Marquez-Vasquez I was better then Barrera-Morales II because both fighters where badly hurt,one went down,the other almost went down and got his nose broken

[alphaqfrankie]

vazquez-marquez.....but i'm bias