Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WBO less respected??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WBO less respected??

    in a nutshell, why is the WBO belt the least respected of the 'big 4'?

    I've heard a lot of people shoot Joe down for only holding the WBO belt for 10 years, and i remember people kicking up a stink when Prince Nas only held the WBO belt.

  • #2
    Originally posted by dansapien View Post
    in a nutshell, why is the WBO belt the least respected of the 'big 4'?

    I've heard a lot of people shoot Joe down for only holding the WBO belt for 10 years, and i remember people kicking up a stink when Prince Nas only held the WBO belt.
    the IBO is more respected than the IBF and WBC

    enough said.

    Comment


    • #3
      cause it was the last of the major belts to come out.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DaveBrown View Post
        the IBO is more respected than the IBF and WBC

        enough said.
        That's a pretty bad joke man. the WBC and the IBF belts are better then the WBO, IBO (which I don't really count as a major title. I mean I don't consider Tarver a champion anymore), and the WBA.

        Personally, I think the WBA is a lot worse then the WBO with all their super champion bull****.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by warp1432 View Post
          That's a pretty bad joke man. the WBC and the IBF belts are better then the WBO, IBO (which I don't really count as a major title. I mean I don't consider Tarver a champion anymore), and the WBA.

          Personally, I think the WBA is a lot worse then the WBO with all their super champion bull****.
          i thought that was the wbc?
          i know the wba's lineage is part of the first belt.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by warp1432 View Post
            That's a pretty bad joke man. the WBC and the IBF belts are better then the WBO, IBO (which I don't really count as a major title. I mean I don't consider Tarver a champion anymore), and the WBA.

            Personally, I think the WBA is a lot worse then the WBO with all their super champion bull****.
            computer based rankings > don kings money

            anyday!!

            Comment


            • #7
              Well yeah, the WBC and the WBA were the felt two bodies, but that still doesn't change the crap they pull off nowadays.

              That and the Super Champion stuff is the WBA.

              Comment


              • #8

                Comment


                • #9
                  If you think about it, the WBO probably has a better reputation than all the other belts. Other than ranking a dead guy of course.

                  Recently they've had good Champions. Wlad, Calzaghe, Calderon, Margarito, Cotto, Taylor, Mormeck, Guzman, Diaz have all held or hold the WBO belt now.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ANTONIM View Post
                    that dont mean ****..

                    just bcoz they are the first dont mean they are the most RESPECTED.

                    there is no correlation to establishment and respect

                    just coz that prick Mayweather only collects WBC belts, dont mean ****..

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP