Shane made it a close fight and he had his moments but to me he definitely looked his age.
If Shane was 7 years younger he would have beaten Cotto no doubt.
Of course. You can make a case that the slightly slower, slightly less accurate, less active and slightly less focused 36 year old Shane won last night.. It's a given that the Mosley that beat DLH would crucifix Cotto..
Shane made it a close fight and he had his moments but to me he definitely looked his age.
If Shane was 7 years younger he would have beaten Cotto no doubt.
truth is when shane was 29, Cotto was 20 and I believe was coming back from a career threatening car accident. It is not fair to compare times, because even as good as Mosley was, right now Cotto is bigger and stronger than that Mosley at 135. I think it is what it is, Cotto beat a 36 yr old Mosley, and we can wonder and speculate, but will never know.
LMAO @ the nut riders voting no and not speaking up because they know how ****sexually irrational they are..
Originally posted by ANTONIM
if thats what you gotta tell your self to not have floyd go in the ring with cotto fine
he will not be sacrificed
If you're talking to me, please.. Cotto's at the stage in his career where Mayweather was when he fought Gatti. I honestly believe that if Cotto fought PBF how he fought Mosley, it would be easy work. Mayweather doesn't need Cotto or Arum at this point; they both need him.. He's the #1 Welter Weight, not to mention p4p fighter in all of boxing.
Comment