Why did they overturn rocky vs mab 1 decision but not pac vs jmm decision?

[rica9475]

People that still think that pacquiao should've won are blind or probably just dellusional pacman groupies,I just call it how I see it.

Oh really???..and what should u call the judge Mr. clements admitted that he wrongfully scored the 1st round?

"Judge admits scoring error!
"I just screwed up!" says Clements...
Judge Burt Clements, who controversially scored Manny Pacquiao's three knockdown round 10-7 instead of 10-6, told the Las Vegas Review Journal after the fight that his scoring of the round was an error. "Clearly, it wasn't non-awareness that there were three knockdowns," said Clements. "I just screwed up. I feel badly because I dropped the ball, plainly and simply. You can make a lot of arguments that it was a very close fight, but that's immaterial. The fact is, I dropped the ball."

How do you explain this?if d judge was able to score it correctly Pacquaio should have won that fight.

[C.C.SABATHIA]

I agree and I cannot wait to watch d rematch (cross my fingers..lol..).

Oh really???..and what should u call the judge Mr. clements admitted that he wrongfully scored the 1st round?

"Judge admits scoring error!
"I just screwed up!" says Clements...
Judge Burt Clements, who controversially scored Manny Pacquiao's three knockdown round 10-7 instead of 10-6, told the Las Vegas Review Journal after the fight that his scoring of the round was an error. "Clearly, it wasn't non-awareness that there were three knockdowns," said Clements. "I just screwed up. I feel badly because I dropped the ball, plainly and simply. You can make a lot of arguments that it was a very close fight, but that's immaterial. The fact is, I dropped the ball."

How do you explain this?if d judge was able to score it correctly Pacquaio should have won that fight.

I dont get it??how could you win a fight by winning 2 rounds and losing the rest???explain that to me???

[GODSAYS]

Pac actually lost that fight.....i had marquez winning by 5 points...i think pac had himself losing by 9 points that is why he is making every excuse not to fight marquez....i don't see pac winning another fight in a while...marquez,soto guzman valerio,juan diaz..all these guys will easily outbox pac...pac only looks fast against old veterans..******ed roach knows that ..that is why he has avoided the actual belt holders for this long...because pac will get exposed ....

[rica9475]

I dont get it??how could you win a fight by winning 2 rounds and losing the rest???explain that to me???

your reading comprehension is weak..nevermind..lets just wait for them to have their rematch..then we wil be back again here to discuss it..at the moment I'm not saying that it will be an easy fight for Pacman, I do acknowledge that Marquez is good,he just not been given enough exposure due to poor management decision.

[rica9475]

Pac actually lost that fight.....i had marquez winning by 5 points...i think pac had himself losing by 9 points that is why he is making every excuse not to fight marquez....i don't see pac winning another fight in a while...marquez,soto guzman valerio,juan diaz..all these guys will easily outbox pac...pac only looks fast against old veterans..******ed roach knows that ..that is why he has avoided the actual belt holders for this long...because pac will get exposed ....

same to you..let us wait and see for the rematch to happen.

[xcaret]

your reading comprehension is weak..nevermind..lets just wait for them to have their rematch..then we wil be back again here to discuss it..at the moment I'm not saying that it will be an easy fight for Pacman, I do acknowledge that Marquez is good,he just not been given enough exposure due to poor management decision.

im not surprised, you couldnt answer his question.....since when did you start watching boxing? in 2003?

[rica9475]

im not surprised, you couldnt answer his question.....since when did you start watching boxing? in 2003?

HMMMM NOP..I STARTED WATCHING PACQUIAO SINCE HIS BLOW BY BLOW(vintage sports) STINT IN MANILA and it was 1995..AND ACTUALLY I ALSO FOLLOWED MIKE TYSON CAREER SINCE NOV 22, 1986 HIS FIRST HEAVYWEIGHT TITLE AGAINST TREVOR BERVICK..TYSON WAS JUST 20 YRS OLD..But i must say you must really too way much older than me XCARET it seems you already passed your MENOPAUSAL PERIOD..OH WAIT..THATS WHY YOU HAVE THIS EMOTIONS AND ALL..IM SORRY GRANNY..


hey XCARET Gaylord did you already drink you anti-depressant pill???

[Fox McCloud]

I had the JMM/PACQUAIO fight a draw also, PAC won the 1st 2 rounds BIG, but guess what? HE DIDN'T WIN ANOTHER ROUND AFTER THAT, JMM gave him a boxing lesson

11 rounds to 1 (when the first round is 10-6), still comes out to 116-109. That's a draw to you?

I had Marquez winning, but that doesn't mean ****. The judges had it how they had it... Pacquiao should have won that fight according to the judges.

[Chups]

im not surprised, you couldnt answer his question.....since when did you start watching boxing? in 2003?

I started watching boxing last year (2006) and I still owned you.

[Chups]

I dont get it??how could you win a fight by winning 2 rounds and losing the rest???explain that to me???

Coz you are the blind mother****er. Pac won more than just the 1st two rounds. He dominated round 10 and the rest of the other rounds were close except for rounds 3,4,5 that JMM dominated.