Tweet
I, II, or III?
-
33Erik Morales beating up Pacquiao in a war (I)60.61%20Pacquiao being the first to KO Morales (II)36.36%12Pacquiao KOing Morales in 3 (III)3.03%1 -
The first one. More drama. Back and forth, though I thought Morales dominated for the most part.
The others were okay. I just felt sorry for EM on the 3rd. It was gutsy for EM to go all out and hope for a KO. Gotta love him. -
I liked the second one because it also had drama. Morales was in control in the first half of the fight and then Pacquiao stepped it up in the late rounds and knocked Morales out.Comment
-
the first one...amazing what a post prime morales could still do...Comment
-
I love the first one, though Pacquiao has lost it but it displays his courage & what a true warrior he is. I did not watched d first time it was aired live here in the Philippines (because I was at work..damn) & I was really SAD when I heard the news that Pacquaio lost the fight I really expected him to win (its like what happen???why he lost???).
But when I saw the replays (its like a view it 100x..lol)..all my respect & admiration for Pacquaio was all intact, I was really proud of him despite his lost to Morales. He showed great courage and did not backdown even if he was all bloody and keep receiving punches frm Morales he always keeps on his attack & go forward like a famous quote in tagalog "Bahala na matira nalang ang matibay, patay kung patay.."Comment
-
2nd one purely because it re-wrote the history books.
No one until Manny was able to ever knock out the man that was the legendary Erik Morales.Comment
-
Easily the second one for me. Just the better fight overall. Lots of blood, back and forth drama. Morales fighting the whole last round southpaw, and getting beaten to a pulp in doing so. That fight was great. Belongs int he discussion with Barrera/Morales I and III.Comment
Comment