just making a poll to see what people think. some people say calzaghe fights in a boring slappy style and that mayweather should not be critcised if joe doesn't. i personally feel joe is much more exciting and his way of boxing has some toe to toe action aswell.
Did you enjoy Calzaghe Vs JKessler or Maywetaher Vs Oscar more?
Collapse
-
-
i think jc vs mk had more action over all
but i couldnt of loved it more to have all the brainwashed oscar fans realize how fake/wack/their george w bush of boxing got schooled.
so its a draw ahahah.
but then again i wanted MK to defeat JC?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
As I've said on the other thread........it was a very good fight.
But if you're gonna give the "Joe is a warrior coming forward/exciting" crap I will point out to how ridiculous he looks in there.Comment
-
can i just ask how many of joe's fights have you seen? i've seen like 15 so that's why i know he can also be a warrior. it was his biggest win ever i feel, but kessler was good enough to make joe not fight his best. i have seen joe fight like a proper warrior a few times. he has a tendacy to leave his arms low and get caught. when he does get hit he will stand there and go toe to toe. that's why our boxing critics love him because he is at his most dangerous when he is hurt. usually the other boxer sees him hurt and goes for the ko, but then joe will hit them back in a flurry and hurt them.
to be fair i havent seen all of mayweather fights if you was wondering. just that he talks a lot but doesn't do it. if mayweather kept his mouth shut i think i would like him for his boxing.Comment
Comment