Do you Usually AGREE or DISAGREE with LEDERMAN's Card

[Kball15]

Lederman IS THE WORST EVER!!!!

SOmetimes it makes you think that there is a different fight playing on his monitor.

He is an incompetant idiot and has been that way for years.

[Easy-E]

He was terrible last night, hes really just not a good judge.

[warp1432]

I usually agree, but somethings of his are just "WTF?!"

For example, giving round 2 in Mayweather Gatti 10-8, yes Mayweather dominated, but why weren't the others 10-8? Seriously...

[zxcvbnmasdf]

usually agree but he completely missed rounds 1/2 yesterday

[MightyMikeA]

Every time there is a major fight... this guy is taking a toll for his scoring...

How do you evaluate Lederman's over all performance?

I heard Lederman is a pharmacist on the side besides his gig with HBO. I honestly feel that he's been taking some of his own magical concoctions lately cause he definitely has to be on some **** with the way he's scoring these rounds lately.

[Derranged_]

Sometimes I wonder what fight Lederman's watching; the second round last night, arguably Kessler's best round, was scored for Calzaghe on Lederman's card....

[warp1432]

Yeah I found that weird also. Though I had it 117-111 for Joe like he did, but it could have been 116-112 since I gave the first round to Calzaghe insted.

[Fox McCloud]

I voted usually disagree.

That being said, he gets most rounds right... because he gets most of the dominant rounds correct, which is expected. He scores close rounds for one fighter, which is acceptable whichever way a close round is scored.

But for the love of, he blows some of the easiest ****ing rounds to score.

Round 2 for Calzaghe over Kessler.
Round 1 for Chavez over Mayweather (Punchstats: Chavez 6 of 92, Mayweather 23 of 56).
Round 1 for Trinidad over Hopkins (which was a carbon copy of every other round in the fight).

A paid judge who has been scoring for 50 years or however long he has been doing it, should not blow rounds that are that easy to score IMO.

[kayjay]

I usually agree. 80% of the time I'd say.

His first three rounds were almost completely opposite as mine. Then he got it right. 9-3, 8-4 is acceptable. I think he had it 9-3.

Those first two weren't easy to score.


I agree with him very often.

[crillz]

I usually agree, yesterday he was right on the money.. 100