which one of these fighters best physical attribute would you pick

[Fox McCloud]

How could any reasonable person say RJJ was not impressive? lol My criticism of RJJ was that he fought tomato cans for 9 years after the Toney fight. I don't believe he did it to avoid people, I believe he did it because he could make millions fighting tomato cans. It was exactly the business plan that I so despise in boxing.

Yeah, I wasn't accusing you of saying that it wasn't impressive. I knew the resume comment was coming. Too many prospects that didn't pan out.

Seriously, would anyone have thought that Roy's resume was better had he stomped Antonio Tarver and Glen Johnson in his first fight against each? **** no, because Tarver would have been another Richard Hall, a prospect who didn't pan out, and Johnson would have been a 10 loss piece of ****.

[Wiley Hyena]

I didn;t chose cause the list does not have JMM. I'd like to have his ability. The guy's got the best offensive skills in the game and it's been that way for many years now.

Ask Roy and Floyd who they love to watch and both of them say JMM. Coincidence? The most underrated fighter of this generation.

I've got JMM in my personal top ten p4p.

[robjr]

Roys athletic ability for sure he could make u look silly and then make u pay. In his prime it was a thing of beauty.

yea what he said..

[Wiley Hyena]

Yeah, I wasn't accusing you of saying that it wasn't impressive. I knew the resume comment was coming. Too many prospects that didn't pan out.

Seriously, would anyone have thought that Roy's resume was better had he stomped Antonio Tarver and Glen Johnson in his first fight against each? **** no, because Tarver would have been another Richard Hall, a prospect who didn't pan out, and Johnson would have been a 10 loss piece of ****.

That's being too cynical IMO. I wouldn't say that. I'm talking about the nine years before Tarver. I wasted alot of money to watch the incredibly talented RJJ beat up ****bags. I can't help it if this sticks in my craw.

[Fox McCloud]

That's being too cynical IMO. I wouldn't say that. I'm talking about the nine years before Tarver. I wasted alot of money to watch the incredibly talented RJJ beat up ****bags. I can't help it if this sticks in my craw.

Julio Cesar Gonzalez, Clinton Woods and Montell Griffin were all pretty good.

[Wiley Hyena]

Julio Cesar Gonzalez, Clinton Woods and Montell Griffin were all pretty good.

Shall I post his entire record of those nine years, or will you give me a nod of credibility on this one point?

[Jim Jeffries]

I forgot how much of a fan I was of Roy Jones back in the day. His second fight with Montel Griffin was a thing of beauty. And yeah, he didn't lose until 35 and had lost enough of his speed to get caught cleanly on the jaw. What pisses me off the most about Mayweather is I think he has the tools to be as exciting as Roy was.

[robjr]

this is off topic but you really gota look at some of the names on his resume.. they were the top dogs at the time and had beaten good opposition.. Roy was just that dominating.. give credit where its due..

[robjr]

I forgot how much of a fan I was of Roy Jones back in the day. His second fight with Montel Griffin was a thing of beauty. And yeah, he didn't lose until 35 and had lost enough of his speed to get caught cleanly on the jaw. What pisses me off the most about Mayweather is I think he has the tools to be as exciting as Roy was.

some.. but he aint no Roy..

[Wiley Hyena]

this is off topic but you really gota look at some of the names on his resume.. they were the top dogs at the time and had beaten good opposition.. Roy was just that dominating.. give credit where its due..

You're talking to a RJJ fan. Albeit a somewhat jaded one. RJJ stands accused of wasting alot of time pounding on ****bags during his prime. I know because I paid to see those friggin fights anyway! The business plan worked to perfection.