Hector Camacho vs Miguel Cotto

**xcaret** · 11-03-2007, 12:15 AM

Chavez vs Camacho all over again.

**shawn_** · 11-03-2007, 12:24 AM

Camacho would win. Cotto cant apply the same kind of effective pressure as Chavez.

**slicksouthpaw16** · 11-03-2007, 12:25 AM

Camacho would be waaaaaaay past his weight and his prime. his natural weight in his prime was 135. he would be stopped under 6 rounds.

**moy22487** · 11-03-2007, 12:47 AM

Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16

Camacho would be waaaaaaay past his weight and his prime. his natural weight in his prime was 135. he would be stopped under 6 rounds.

just an FYI these what if fights are probably if they were both in primes

**moy22487** · 11-03-2007, 12:50 AM

Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16

Camacho would be waaaaaaay past his weight and his prime. his natural weight in his prime was 135. he would be stopped under 6 rounds.

ignore second post

**QuCongee** · 11-03-2007, 12:55 AM

147? Cotto KO 6. 135? H.C. UD. Then again, did Cotto ever even fight at 35?

**dino** · 11-04-2007, 11:12 PM

camacho was a slapper, he was the paulie malgnaggi/cory spinks of his day. cotto destroys him in brutal fashion ala paulie malgnaggi

**shocky** · 11-04-2007, 11:19 PM

Dumbest question ever on this forum. sleep if off and quit smoking crack...

**dino** · 11-04-2007, 11:22 PM

Originally posted by shocky

Dumbest question ever on this forum. sleep if off and quit smoking crack...

HOW is this dumb you ****ing idiot? camacho was a champ @ 147 and cotto is a champ. YOU KNOW OLDER FIGHTERS ALWAYS GET MORE CREDIT THEN YOUNGER FIGHTERS, EVEN IF THE FIGHT WOULDN'T GO 4 ROUNDS

Hector Camacho vs Miguel Cotto