Juan Diaz

[joepal]

As a fighter, I like him. As far as a person goes, he's a person who lacks in character. Not much to like about a loudmouth who hits women. Jesus, you're close-minded.

Close-minded refers to a guy who would have a boxer win everytime, all the time.

[BROOKLYN CESAR]

Yeah i agree he is a very impressive fighter!!! I hope he can keep up the good work!!!

[THe TRiNiTY]

Close-minded refers to a guy who would have a boxer win everytime, all the time.

That's true. With that said, Mayweather lost the first fight with Castillo. If you've read my posts in the thread, asking that question, you'd know I said it there. Mayweather lost to Castillo, had a tough time, but in my opinion, won the second fight. You could make an argument that he came close to losing in De La Hoya, I happen to disagree.

I also think he would lose to Paul Williams, if Williams continues to develop. He'd have problems with Cotto or Mosley, too. I'm not a Mayweather nuthugger. Jesus, let that go. You can't use that in an argument with me, because I'm not huge on Mayweather. p4p, Ivan Calderon is also more skilled than Mayweather, in my opinion. I don't know what proof you need, more than that.

[Peterp]

i don't believe he's the best but he's fun to watch

[joepal]

That's true. With that said, Mayweather lost the first fight with Castillo. If you've read my posts in the thread, asking that question, you'd know I said it there. Mayweather lost to Castillo, had a tough time, but in my opinion, won the second fight. You could make an argument that he came close to losing in De La Hoya, I happen to disagree.

I also think he would lose to Paul Williams, if Williams continues to develop. He'd have problems with Cotto or Mosley, too. I'm not a Mayweather nuthugger. Jesus, let that go. You can't use that in an argument with me, because I'm not huge on Mayweather. p4p, Ivan Calderon is also more skilled than Mayweather, in my opinion. I don't know what proof you need, more than that.

Cute, but no cigar. This is obviously your most anti-Floyd post, but even then, it ACTUALLY praises Floyd. The devil is in the detail.

Here is what you just said:

1. You thought Floyd lost to Castillo, but imply that it was CLOSE. You had him CLEARLY winning the rematch.

2. You thought that Floyd CLEARLY win the DLH fight.

3. You concede that he loses to Williams, BUT ONLY with the caveat that Paul needs to develop, whatever that means.

4. You'd say that he'd have problems with Cotto/Mosley, but will never concede directly that he loses to them.

5. You say that Calderon is p4p more skilled than Floyd, but then everybody knew that already.

Result? You fail miserably in convincing us that you're not a Floyd nuthugger. You were supposed to come up with your most anti-Floyd sentiments, and still it fails to even be characterized as anti-Floyd.

And you say you don't even like him.

[GTL]

how about you both shut the **** up.. this is NOT a mayweather thread..