Poll: Floyd v. Castillo I...who won?

[joepal]

How I score fights determines if I can stand on a moral highground? Are you suggesting somebody paid me off to score the fight in favor of Floyd?

You sir, are a genius.

You shouldn't be wasting your time here with us simpletons. Run off to your Mensa meeting and invent cold fusion!

Thank god you acknowledged your own intellectual inferiority. Realization is a good start.

[El Dominicano]

I thought Castillo won the rematch too. Regardless, Floyd fans would have it that the first fight was close but the second was not. WHICH IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT HAD HAPPENED, since in the first fight JLC overwhelmed Floyd, and actually gave a good account of himself in the rematch.

But then these are Floyd fans after all, who always rewrite history as they see fit to hype their man, like KT ducked Floyd when it was the other way around, etcetera, etcetera.

Wow! U think JLC won the 2nd?? Idk what to say... I mean are u serious?? I saw 2nd fight as easy win for PBF.

[Run]

Thank god you acknowledged your own intellectual inferiority. Realization is a good start.

You scored the JMM/John fight widely in favor of John.

You have no business discussing "moral high ground" or "scoring fights".



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[Wiley Hyena]

I have nothing against anybody making a valid argument against Floyd. The problem is... most people don't. Most of your posts consist of repeating similar comments that, while might look informative, are really more similar to a politician's argument. Dancing around facts more often than not, and responding with what is essentially hearsay is not good debate.

You want to insult Floyd's style as not entertaining. Feel free to. You want to say Castillo won their first bout?. Sure, it was close. You want to rag on Floyd for his personality and demeanor in and out of the ring? I'm right there with you.

You lose me when you choose to **** an argument on these forums day in and day out that is nothing more than a biased opinion that has more to do with pure opinion than anything factual. This isn't just you, keep in mind. You help to propagate this behavior though.

Dirt... Mayweather and Hatton are consistently the most talked about boxers on this site right now because their fight is huge for boxing in most people's opinion. You act as if I'm the only guy out there. I'll take that as a compliment.

Furthermore, you're hypocritical. You jump in the fray like a shark in bloody water when your "side" is trying to make a point that you agree with. There are no standards to be observed when your gang is at work. So stop moralizing with me, and disprove what I say if you disagree. You'll find that I'll readily admit when I'm wrong. But attacking the messenger cannot defeat the message. Those tactics just serve to support my arguments.

[Dirt E Gomez]

You scored the JMM/John fight widely in favor of John.

You have no business discussing "moral high ground" or "scoring fights".

No no no, don't you get it Spoons? That man is clearly Burt Sugar, Dan Rafael, Jesus, Megatron, and Ray Robinson and all rolled into one man! He is infallible.

[joepal]

My wording was fine. You're just too idiotic to get how a person can phrase things. Learn how to read, with punctuation involved. Get it?

Wow, the lengths this closet nuthugger (he says he doesn't like Floyd) would go to just to defend a point about Floyd. Here, he vigorously argues (to the point of insulting naysayers) that Floyd won the 2nd fight, and even if he did lose the first fight, it was so close it didn't matter. Which is actually the EXACT OPPOSITE of what had happened.

Get a life you loser.

[joepal]

You scored the JMM/John fight widely in favor of John.

You have no business discussing "moral high ground" or "scoring fights".

I didn't score the fight widely in favor of John.

On the contrary, I think I got more credibility than some Floyd fans in here. And pretty darn proud of it.

[Dirt E Gomez]

Wow, the lengths this closet nuthugger (he says he doesn't like Floyd) would go to just to defend a point about Floyd. Here, he vigorously argues (to the point of insulting naysayers) that Floyd won the 2nd fight, and even if he did lose the first fight, it was so close it didn't matter. Which is actually the EXACT OPPOSITE of what had happened.

Get a life you loser.

That's the opposite of what happened? I seem to recall Mayweather winning both fights according to judges scores. Maybe I'm crazy.

[joepal]

That's the opposite of what happened? I seem to recall Mayweather winning both fights according to judges scores. Maybe I'm crazy.

You sure were, and so were the judges, for Floyd. All while singing Madonna's "I'm Crazy for You".

[joepal]

Dirt... Mayweather and Hatton are consistently the most talked about boxers on this site right now because their fight is huge for boxing in most people's opinion. You act as if I'm the only guy out there. I'll take that as a compliment.

Furthermore, you're hypocritical. You jump in the fray like a shark in bloody water when your "side" is trying to make a point that you agree with. There are no standards to be observed when your gang is at work. So stop moralizing with me, and disprove what I say if you disagree. You'll find that I'll readily admit when I'm wrong. But attacking the messenger cannot defeat the message. Those tactics just serve to support my arguments.

Yeah. If Dirt E Gomez had great morals, then Mother Teresa is a slut.