I know a lot of people say that he lost the first fight versus Whitiker. But how can the judges give the fight to whitiker when all Whitiker was mainly doing is, jab and run!
All while Ramierz was throwng bunch of punchs and following and crowding Whitiker.
Just to be fair ive also read my share of comments that Ramierz won fair and square. Not the bull**** i hear most times that Whitiker won by a landslid. It was a close fight, but i have to give it to the Champ, Ramierez. Yes, its a boxing match, but when you are fighting for the title you have to take! the title from the Champion! At least thats how it used to be, how it used to be said and what was expected from a title challenger.
Now, to the old school boxing fans where do you put Jose Luis Ramierz in boxing legend status and in Mexican Boxing status? I know Ramierz beat some good fighters, he himself imo, got robbed when he fought Arguello.
And does Ramierz still live in Spain? And if he does, im sure thats why he's not mentioned much by Mexican boxing announcers.
All while Ramierz was throwng bunch of punchs and following and crowding Whitiker.
Just to be fair ive also read my share of comments that Ramierz won fair and square. Not the bull**** i hear most times that Whitiker won by a landslid. It was a close fight, but i have to give it to the Champ, Ramierez. Yes, its a boxing match, but when you are fighting for the title you have to take! the title from the Champion! At least thats how it used to be, how it used to be said and what was expected from a title challenger.
Now, to the old school boxing fans where do you put Jose Luis Ramierz in boxing legend status and in Mexican Boxing status? I know Ramierz beat some good fighters, he himself imo, got robbed when he fought Arguello.
And does Ramierz still live in Spain? And if he does, im sure thats why he's not mentioned much by Mexican boxing announcers.
Comment